Monday, November 30, 2020

Rivian the "Tesla Killer" - HOW TO PLAY IPO's / "BLDR" - hydrogen fuel Cells

 

What Is Rivian? Behind the $2.2 Billion "Tesla Killer"

Rivian is an electric vehicle manufacturer, best known for its SUVs and pickup trucks.

The company was founded by Robert Scaringe in 2009, after he graduated from MIT. Just 11 years later, the company already has more than 1,000 employees.

Because it remains a private company, financial details are scarce.

We do know the company has massive potential.

Rivian's most notable vehicle is the R1S. It's an SUV meant to rival Tesla Inc.'s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Model X. The company claims the R1S can drive between 240 and 410 miles on a single charge. If true, that would significantly outpace the Model X's range of 237 to 295 miles. Rivian's version is expected to retail between $70,000 and $90,000.

While those expectations are promising, they are still just expectations. Rivian has yet to sell a single passenger vehicle.

So why does the company, and a potential IPO, have so much hype if it isn't selling cars?

Jeff Bezos.

The world's richest man and founder of Amazon visited the company's headquarters in Michigan in the fall of 2019. After seeing its operations, he pledged to buy 100,000 of its vans for Amazon's delivery services.

Delivery of these vehicles is expected in 2021. Amazon hopes to have 10,000 of the vehicles in operation by 2022. The full delivery of 100,000 electric vans isn't expected until 2030.

Since then, speculation has run rampant about a potential IPO for Rivian stock.

But does all that hype mean that Rivian stock is a "Buy" after the IPO? Here's the full answer…

Should I Buy Rivian Stock After the IPO?

For advice on how to handle the Rivian IPO, I turned to Money Morning Defense and Tech Specialist Michael A. Robinson.

In his 35 years as a Silicon Valley insider, Michael has seen hundreds (and maybe even thousands) of these "hot" new tech IPOs. There might not be anyone more qualified on the topic.

"For years now, I've advised my readers about how the average retail investor should avoid buying high-tech IPOs when they first start trading," Michael said. "When you buy at the open, you really risk losing your hard-earned money. Problem is, people just can't wait. They want in – and they want in fast."

It's that temptation to buy right at the open that ends up crushing retail investors like us.

You see, the large institutional investors (think big banks and billionaire hedge fund owners) get to buy in at the "IPO price."

So on the day of an IPO, you'll often hear about the stock's IPO price. But that is very different from the "opening price" that you and I can buy in at.

Let's look at the infamous GoPro Inc. (NASDAQ: GPRO) IPO from 2014.

Before shares went public, GPRO set an IPO price of $24 for shares. That's where the big institutions got in. But when the stock opened on the market, demand was so high that shares immediately started trading at $35.76. That's where you and I could have bought in.

Think of that. We would have immediately paid 49% more per share than the Wall Street insiders did.

But that's not where the fleecing ends.

Those institutional investors typically need to hold shares for 90 to 180 days before they can sell. This is called a "lockup period." In the case of GoPro, the lockup period was 180 days.

After 180 days, GoPro stock was priced near $69 per share. Institutional investors who sold then made a 188% gain.

But in the year following GPRO's lockup period, shares tanked an incredible 75%. So if you had bought in at $35.76, you'd have lost 50% of your investment in just 18 months. Today, shares trade for just over $4. That's a loss of almost 89% from that opening price.

No wonder Michael calls IPOs a "rigged game."

Instead, Michael recommends waiting until after the lockup period ends before even thinking about buying into one of these hot tech stocks.

"It's much better to hold off for a little more than six months from when the stock hits the market," Michael said. "That's when insiders can sell, an event that usually means a big drop in price. Then, healthy companies start to see their shares push higher…"

After those six months pass, you'll have two earnings reports that you can review. With those, you'll have a much clearer picture of where the company has been and where it's headed. Plus, shares are typically trading cheaper than they were during the hysteria of the opening.

We recommend this same strategy when it comes to Rivian stock. Leading up to the IPO, very little financial information about the company will be available to you. It's better to wait the six months for the hype to die down and see what you're really getting with the stock.

If you're looking for a way to profit from an explosive industry immediately, we have more information for you below.

Action to Take: We're still waiting to find out the Rivian IPO date, but our advice will be the same whenever the company goes public. Wait at least six months after the stock has begun trading before you think about buying in. Continue following along at Money Morning in the lead-up to the IPO. We'll keep you up to date as more details emerge.

The Clock Is Ticking…




The most-requested teaser to start this fresh new year is probably the Blue Gas/Tesla Killer one from Jimmy Mengel, in an ad for The Crow’s Nest ($99/yr) — and today I’m finally getting to it. If you’re keeping track, we first saw these “Blue Gas” iterations of the ad around December 18 (though different “Tesla Killer” ads for different kinds of batteries or motors have cycled through our stories here several times over the past few years).

The spiel is all about something he calls “Blue Gas”, and it’s a little bit reminiscent of all the natural gas vehicle teaser pitches we saw eight or ten years ago… but the technology is a little different. The ad starts out with Mengel’s visit to California to try out a “blue gas” car in person, in a place where it’s poised to, he implies, take over the trucking industry…

“On the road out here you’ll see more Priuses and Teslas than in any other city in America. But this has nothing to do with either.

“In fact, here at this unknown site, salt-of-the-earth truck drivers are making the carbon-free energy revolution possible.

“You see, this gas station is at the epicenter of a $2.5 trillion revolution in energy.

“One that involves a weird form of fuel known as ‘Blue Gas.'”

So what is this magical blue gas?

“It doesn’t involve lithium or batteries or rare earths.

“It doesn’t involve solar, wind, water, biofuels, or any other form of renewable energy you’ve heard of.

“And of course it doesn’t involve oil, coal, or any other fossil fuel.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here... 

“Best of all, it’s 100% emissions free…

“It takes moments to fill up…

“And it’s 300% more powerful than oil.”

So that sounds perfect, right? No long recharge waits like for an electric car, not dirty like oil or gas. Magical!

How, then, does one make money from this technology?

“My research shows that one $3 stock at the epicenter of the ‘Blue Gas’ revolution is set to trade higher than Tesla.

“Delivering earth-shattering gains of 11,666%.

“Not nine years down the road. Or even five years.

“A massive catalyst in the next few months, that I’ll reveal today, is ready to launch its share price vertical.”

Drooling yet? Don’t worry, that’s mostly the marketing — these gains never, of course, show up overnight… and, sadly, such information is never held solely in the hand of one dude who’s selling a newsletter for 99 bucks.

Which doesn’t mean it won’t be a worthwhile investment to consider, of course, just that we should get the daydreams of 11,000% returns in a few months out of our heads first.

How about some more clues to lead us to the prize?

“The ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, two of the nation’s largest shipping points, are now deploying a fleet of “Blue Gas” trucks…”

So at this point it’s pretty clear that Mengel is talking up hydrogen fuel cells… which he does “reveal” later on. Fuel cells are not particularly new technology, but they have made some jumps forward in recent years.

And like all new transportation fuels or strategies, the easiest way to start is with local fleet vehicles — garbage trucks, delivery trucks, and other vehicles where fuel is a major cost and where they travel in a small enough area that they can depend on a very limited refueling infrastructure.

And this is positioned as competition for electric vehicles, and particularly for Tesla….

“The Budweiser company Anheuser-Busch is now planning a complete makeover of its truck fleet. It wants to be completely emission-free in the next few years.

“And it’s using ‘Blue Gas’ to make that transition possible.

“That’s why the beer giant recently bought 800 tractor trailers fueled by ‘Blue Gas.’

“That’s almost the entire company’s shipping fleet.

“Just to round it out, it purchased a mere 40 trucks from Tesla….

“When it comes to heavy-duty trucking power, ‘Blue Gas’ beats Tesla hands down.”

But it’s not just big fleet trucks that are going to switch over…

“Today there are only 11,000 vehicles powered by ‘Blue Gas.’ We’re on the ground floor.

“But according to the big car giants…

“There will be over 10 million ‘Blue Gas’ vehicles on the road in the next few years.”

I wouldn’t say that’s the stance of the “car giants” … but it is the goal of some governments and other bodies that are pushing for fuel cell adoption — the last conference included that 10 million vehicle “pledge” (in ten years).

And apparently there is some progress in building out the infrastructure…

“Just a few years ago, there were virtually no “Blue Gas” stations. Today, there are 300 worldwide.

“But as more gas stations switch from serving oil to “Blue Gas”…

“That number is projected to surge to over 5,000 in a few short years.”

That same International conference included the goal of 10,000 fueling stations to serve those ten million vehicles, with a real push from Japan… not surprising, since Toyota is the major automaker that’s most invested in hydrogen fuel cells.

And he goes into why hydrogen fuel cells are a better option…

“Unlike batteries… the engine technology behind ‘Blue Gas’ is:

“Safe and non-explosive.

“Takes under five minutes to refill.

“Lasts days or even weeks.

“And it’s incredibly lightweight.

“In the race for clean trucks, trains, and buses, “Blue Gas” is second to none.”

A big part of the reason why he thinks it’s going to be big is that China is pushing fuel cell tech forward…

“China’s ‘Elon Musk.’ recently made a stunning announcement…

“In short, he called for a complete shift in China to ‘Blue Gas.’

“And when this guy speaks, the Chinese government acts.

“After all, he was responsible for the country’s electric car revolution to begin with.

“The Chinese are committing a stunning $66 billion to back ‘Blue Gas.’

“In fact, the world’s largest ‘Blue Gas’ station just opened in Shanghai.”

And what’s the stock? We finally get a few clues…

“… the $3 tech stock that first began this revolution 40 years ago.”

And some hype, for good measure….

“This Is More Lucrative Than Any Pot Stock I’ve Recommended

“Even more than Bitcoin and other cryptos…

“That’s because it’s moving to the epicenter of the trillion-dollar electric vehicle revolution…

“A historic trillion-dollar energy shift that’s already transforming the way that millions power their cars…”

That “40 years ago” bit is relevant, this company is somehow connected to the “father of fuel cells”…

“… except for a few ‘niche’ markets like submarines or spacecraft, fuel cells weren’t used much.

“They simply weren’t inexpensive and small enough for everyday cars and trucks.

“In 1987, everything changed.

“One energy legend, now known as the ‘father of fuel cell technology’, made a historic discovery that put…

“Fuel Cells on the Inevitable Path to Energy Dominance”

And he talks about some fuel cell stocks that surged last year, Plug Power (PLUG), Proton Power Systems (PPS on the AIM in London), and Hydrogenics… and Hydrogenics was bought by Cummins (CMI), which leads Mengel to anticipate a “buyout surge” that will lead to a takeover frenzy for his favorite secret stock…

“A buyout frenzy is underway on small companies that are deploying the technology.

“And I’ve identified the next big takeout target…

“The tiny $3 stock I mentioned today, the one founded by the innovator behind the fuel cell revolution.”

Other clues about this one $3 stock? We get this…

“… after signing $200 million worth of deals with China’s largest engine and auto parts companies…

“It’s the frontrunner for the world’s biggest fuel cell market…

“In Shandong province alone, it’s rolling out 2,000 fuel cell buses.

“And this company is supplying it all.”

So who’s our little target? What’s “the $3 tech stock that first began this revolution 40 years ago?”

This must be little Ballard Power Systems (BLDP)… which is not a $3 stock anymore, and hasn’t been for more than six months (it was right around $7 the first time I saw this teaser ad, about six weeks ago), but it is connected to (the late) Geoffrey Ballard, the father of the fuel cell and founder of the company… and it would not be surprising if they just repurposed the spiel from a recommendation that was made a few months earlier to Jimmy Mengel’s subscribers (that’s just a guess, but it’s pretty common practice for newsletter ad copywriters).

Geoffrey Ballard left active management at Ballard Power almost 20 years ago, and, in fact, formed another company that was subsequently sold to Plug Power, another oft-touted fuel cell company, but he certainly left a legacy at BLDP.

And yes, China is a big market for fuel cells (and everything else, pretty much), and Ballard does have an “in” thanks to the fact that they sold out part of the company to form a Chinese joint venture with Weichai Power.

All of the fuel cell stocks have gone bonkers at one point or another in the past few months, driving this particular one up above $10 for a while (the stock touched $12 last week, though it’s below $10 again now)… so what’s the story?

Well, frankly, the most obvious thing you note upon a quick look at the financials is that Ballard is trading like one of the crazy cloud software stocks — at a valuation of $2 billion, it’s trading at more than 20X sales, is nowhere near profitability, and is expected to grow sales at about 35-40% a year as they sell fuel cell stacks into their buses/trucks joint venture in China as well as for existing markets (backup power, forklifts).

The future is very much lined up with China and their technology transfer to their Weichai joint venture (agreed to in early 2018), which is causing some fears and also some profit lust — which probably explains some of the surge in the past few months, as trade war fears have ebbed a bit and the stock has more than doubled in the past six months.

Not for the first time, I should note. The stock has been teased in the past as fuel cell excitement has heated up, and it has surged a few times before — particularly in 2014 and 2017. So the warning signal for investors is that things didn’t work out very well for those who bought Ballard Power the last couple times it surged quickly higher like this.

As with Plug Power and Fuel Cell and the rest of the industry, presumably a lot of the future for Ballard depends on what governments or larger companies do to push forward with hydrogen fueling stations… either in China or the US, or elsewhere… and whether alternative energy makes it far enough that generating, storing and transporting hydrogen ends up being efficient and feasible on a large scale (the government lays out some of the challenges here, in case you’re curious).

There’s some interesting bigger-picture thinking here from a couple years ago that makes some sense to me, though I’m far from being an expert on the science. Hydrogen is a challenge both because of the energy cost to create it, and because it can be challenging to store and transport safely (though natural gas and gasoline are also a challenge on that front, to be fair, and, yes, lithium batteries pose fire risks).

So the dream is that refueling stations will create their own hydrogen from electrolysis instead of having to set up a transportation infrastructure of pipelines or trucks for liquid hydrogen, and that hydrogen generation would take a lot of electricity — hopefully, for the sake of reducing reliance on fossil fuels, electricity from solar and wind and other relatively clean sources… though there are other ways to generate hydrogen as well, of course, with probably the most likely first wave using natural gas as a feedstock and fuel. Though the real hope for the next few years is not from hydrogen-powered cars, it’s all about those predictable and restricted fleet vehicles like port trucks and delivery trucks and buses — which should ring a bell for those who hoped for great riches from the natural gasification of trucking fleets a decade ago.

As an aside… remember Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) and Westport (WPRT), the standard bearers of the natural gas transportation revolution that was heavily talked up just after the global financial crisis? They’re still around, and still generally growing revenue, but their share prices are down ~90% from their story-driven highs of early 2012, and I’d be surprised if they regain those highs in my lifetime.

So maybe hydrogen ends up being a better solution for a battery-powered fleet (hydrogen fuel cells are essentially batteries that get their charge from hydrogen, with the real advantage being that fuel cell refueling is faster than recharging, and the fuel cells have longer useful lives)… though the established electricity infrastructure (power lines, etc.) and lack of a hydrogen infrastructure means that hydrogen would also presumably have a pretty short time period in which it could “win” over batteries (assuming, of course, that battery technology continues to improve).

Ballard’s latest quarterly presentation is full of future promise but not terribly inspiring on the financial front. Yes, the promise is real, things could work out well… but right now, they aren’t. There’s an interesting Bloomberg interview with Ballard’s CEO Randy MacEwen here, essentially pointing to 2021 or 2022 as the first time investors begin to envision a future profit for BLDP, and 2025 as the forecasted beginning of the rapid growth trajectory that he envisions.

So, again, this is buying the future — or, more specifically, buying one future in which hydrogen fuel cells build on their early success in forklifts to take a huge market share in heavy trucks and buses, and hoping that Ballard will lead in this future. That’s been promoted many times in Ballard’s history, and past dreams haven’t materialized, but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible this time… just that we should check our assumptions and be skeptical of the promotions. I don’t know whether this hydrogen fuel cell future will come, or if Ballard will remain a leader, but I’d bet on it continuing to be a very volatile ride.

Thoughts, comments, questions? Let ’em loose with a comment below… and thanks for reading!

 MACARM'd


Buttery Smooth: The Mac ARMed

|
131 comments
|
 About: Apple Inc. (AAPL)Includes: ADBEAMDAMZNDELLGOOGGOOGLHPINTCMSFTNVDAQCOM
Trading Places Research
Long/Short Equity, Value, long-term horizon, Growth
Summary

As promised, the Apple Silicon Macs are “buttery smooth.” They exceed even my very high expectations.

It represents a huge milestone in a slow revolution in tech. This is the biggest threat ever to the x86 platform.

Apple has shown everyone that ARM platforms can not only compete with x86, but can exceed its performance.

Owning “the whole widget” gives Apple a huge advantage here and with future products.

There is a very large opportunity for someone else to make robust platforms for ARM on Windows and in the data center.

Is Palantir The Next Facebook - MorningBrew

 

Is Palantir The Next Facebook Or The Next Myspace?

|
317 comments
|
 About: Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)
   
Summary

Palantir has continued to perform incredibly well, but that doesn't change the fact that it's priced for massive growth.

Facebook managed to drive strong shareholder financial rewards as it grew, while Myspace made bad moves chasing growth.

We see Palantir as the next Facebook, due its strong financial improvements and focus, but the company does have risks worth looking at.

I do much more than just articles at The Energy Forum: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more. Get started today »

Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has had a great November, growing its market capitalization to more than $50 billion. In the space of tech IPOs, this isn't particularly unique. However, the question becomes, how much runway is left. In the social media world, there's two classic companies.

Myspace, the largest worldwide social network from 2005-2009, never truly figured out how to monetize its user base, putting too many ads, becoming uncompetitive, and losing its user base. Facebook (FB) managed to efficiently and thoroughly monetize its user base, and is now a near-$1 trillion company with an incredible FCF profile. Since its post IPO lows, the company has returned nearly 15x to shareholders.

As we'll see throughout this article, we view Palantir as the next Facebook due to its unique characteristics.

Palantir Should Be Valued at a Substantial Discount To Its Bandied About $20 Billion Valuation

(Palantir - Wccftech)

Company Overview

Palantir is a large American public software company that specifies in Big Data analytics. Big Data analytics is a complicated and involved field, which requires a massive number of hardworking engineers and significant years of experience to be able to understand how to not only best provide those analytics, but turn them into useful consumable data.

That's something that most companies don't have the know-how, financial ability, or willingness to do. However, it's something that nearly every business can benefit from, and something that's immensely popular. Palantir is a unique player here, often the only consumer in its space, and it has the potential to drive significant rewards.

Company's Contracts and Businesses

Palantir's unique businesses means that the company has achieved a number of unique businesses.

(Palantir Energy Supermajor - Palantir Investor Presentation)

Palantir, through the worst energy collapse in 2020 due to COVID-19, saw an energy supermajor deploy its ERP suite. That deployment, within 2 weeks, allowed $57 million in cash savings and is expected to be able to drive $1 billion in savings on an annualized basis. The value of Palantir's assets are clear here, and it highlights the value of the company's assets.

The U.S. Justice Department versus Purdue Pharma, the World Food Programme, and U.S. Special Forces. The company, as we'll see through the financial section, is continuously getting new contracts, helping its customers, and doing incredibly well with its customers. Another recent contract was a $91 million 2-year deal with the U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

(Palantir New Aerospace Company - Palantir Investor Presentation)

As COVID-19 has shaken up industries around the world, companies have been forced to adapt and look for savings, and Palantir has been at the forefront of that. The aerospace agency is one of those that has suffered the most due to COVID-19, and it's simultaneously one of the industries with the most room for Big Data improvements.

Palantir's $300 million 5-year renewal deal here is not only the start, but it highlights the financial potential.

3Q Financials

On the back of this, it's worth discussing Palantir's recent 3Q financial performance, which has boosted the share price significantly.

(Palantir 3Q 2020 Financials - Palantir Investor Presentation)

Palantir has seen its revenue increase 52% YoY to almost $1.2 billion annualized. That means that the company is trading at an incredibly high multiple of roughly 40x price-to-sales. The company's operating income has switched from a $92 million loss in 3Q 2019 to $73 million in 3Q 2020, representing even more significant YoY growth.

However, the key takeaway here isn't that Palantir's growing, it's that it needs massive growth. The company eventually needs to be several dozen times its current size, in order to justify its valuation.

Overall Financial Growth

Fortunately, Palantir's overall financial growth is significant, and the company has significant potential to drive shareholder returns.

(Palantir Growth - Palantir Investor Presentation)

For those who've never participated in the business to business sales industry, it's a tough and slow-moving business regardless of your company's size. Fortunately, Palantir's worked to handle that by growing its average revenue per customer and its average revenue of top customers, in addition to getting new customers.

The company's average revenue per customer has gone up 38% YoY, while the average revenue of its top 20 customers has gone up 36% YoY. Simultaneously, Palantir's top 20 customers have gone down from 68% of its revenue to 61% of revenues. As customers continue to utilize the software and expand it, the company has potential.

(Palantir Three Phase Guidance - Palantir Investor Presentation)

Palantir has continued to expand in the acquire phase, expand phase, and scale phase. The company has seen new customers provide significantly more revenue at less expense. In the expand phase and the scale phase, revenue is increasingly dramatically. The company's expand phase revenue for 2020 is almost at its 2019 scale phase revenue.

This comes with significantly more margins on these established businesses. The revenue growth (44% YoY) and operating margin growth (12% YoY) combined are enormous for Palantir. If the company can continue achieving this growth, it can rapidly justify its current valuation. Continued growth here is what investors should pay close attention to.

However, given the abilities of Palantir's software, we feel it's a likely-case scenario.

Risk

Palantir's risk is two-fold, and it's worth keeping close attention to both of these given the company's current valuation.

The first is that the company's growth might not continue. It has performed so far; however, tech is always a difficult business, and a business-to-business sales industry is slow and tough. However, the company's multiple requires growth, and Myspace, in chasing growth, made some bad moves in the rush. The same could befall Palantir.

The company's second risk is that it is unpopular due to some of the government groups it works with. While we believe that Palantir is a net benefit, it could face increased regulation or investigation into its businesses that come at a significant cost. That could significantly hurt the company's ability to drive shareholder rewards.

Conclusion

Palantir has continued to outperform, both from a share price perspective and from a business perspective. The company has a valuable portfolio of data technology assets, and in an as uncertain time as COVID-19, it has the potential to drive strong financial rewards for customers, although business-to-business sales are slow.

We see the company as the next Facebook, due to its improving financial capacity and ability to drive shareholder rewards here. However, we recommend keeping a close eye on whether or not that pans out. Palantir is worth a cautious investment at this time, as investors continue to pay attention to the growth story.

Create a High Yield Energy Portfolio - 2 Week Free Trial!

The Energy Forum can help you generate high-yield income from a portfolio of quality energy companies. Worldwide energy demand is growing and you can be a part of this exciting trend. 

Getting in Line for a Vaccine Like

 

PUBLIC HEALTH

Getting in Line for a Vaccine Like

Giphy

Reality check: There won't be enough Covid-19 vaccines for everyone for a while. Probably years. Thankfully, the CDC has some rules so distribution won't look like a run on the Hunger Games cornucopia.

Once a vaccine is approved by the FDA, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will hold an emergency meeting within 48 hours to finalize recommendations around who gets the first shots. That guidance will be given at the national scale, which means state health officials will be left to figure out the nitty-gritty details of where the vials are going.

  • As we saw early in the pandemic with various lockdown measures, approaches by states can vary. 

Who's first? 

The U.S.' ~20 million healthcare workers, including doctors, nurses, and support staff, will likely be top priority. Three other groups are widely considered to be especially vulnerable to the coronavirus: 

  • The elderly (about 50 million Americans ages 65+)
  • People with underlying conditions (80–100 million)
  • Essential workers (40–60 million)

That's a lot of millions, and definitely more than we'll have vaccines for at first. Even people who qualify for priority vaccination will contend with limited supply.  

Some public health experts have also argued for early vaccinations for racial and ethnic minorities, who've experienced higher rates of coronavirus infection and death.

And the children? Pharmaceuticals are, for good reason, not tested on kids first, and it'll take longer to get a vaccine approved for the youths. Only a few companies, including Pfizer, have started pediatric trials.

Other factors to consider

#1: Different vaccines have different logistical challenges and health considerations, which could affect who gets what when. Some vaccines may be better suited for the elderly, people with heart conditions, or pregnant women. Single-dose vaccines and ones that don't require ultra-cold storage can reach rural communities more easily. 

#2: Is the goal to limit spread or deaths? Before the swine flu pandemic, the strategy was to vaccinate the most vulnerable first. But in 2009, researchers published a study suggesting a focus on vaccinating the biggest spreaders—in the case of swine flu, children ages 5–19—to protect everyone else. 

  • It helped, and now CDC guidance advises annual flu shots for kids six months and older.

#3: Not everyone will get a vaccine. In the last decade, the U.S. has never vaccinated more than half of adults for the flu, and vaccination rates for Black, Latinx, and high-risk adults trend lower. 

        

 

GEOPOLITICS

Once We Have a Vaccine...Will We Share It?

 

If you thought state bidding wars for ventilators were ruthless, wait until you learn about the global competition for coronavirus vaccines. The Duke Global Health Institute estimates 9.6 billion doses are already reserved by individual countries, without any vaccines having reached the market yet. 

The early leaders? Wealthier countries.

  • The U.S., UK, EU, Canada, and Japan have secured 1.1 billion shots of Pfizer's vaccine, roughly 85% of planned production through 2021. 
  • Moderna's first 20 million doses will head to the U.S., which has a contract for 100 million. 

Governments were hedging bets by investing in multiple vaccine candidates. But some have struck enough deals that, if multiple vaccines get regulatory approval, they could control a big chunk of supply. For instance, Canada could end up with enough doses to vaccinate its population 5x over. 

Economist

That's a bit lopsided

Which is where Covax comes in. This WHO-led initiative is working to ensure equitable vaccine access across the world. 

How it works: There are 184 countries participating, with wealthier countries subsidizing vaccine access for 92 lower- and middle-income ones, particularly across Africa and South and Southeast Asia. The goal is to raise $5 billion and provide 2 billion doses by the end of 2021.

  • So far, Covax has secured 700 million doses and $2 billion in funding.
  • The U.S. is not currently participating; President-elect Joe Biden hasn't said whether his administration will join.

Pharma companies AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax, and Sanofi plan to produce 3 billion doses for developing countries—some through Covax. 

Big picture: The Duke Global Health Institute thinks it'll take until 2024 for vaccines to reach the entire population. In that time, vaccines could be a new front in geopolitics.

        

 

POLL

Prick Me With Your Best Shot

Giphy

Or don't. In a Gallup poll this month, 42% of U.S. adults said they would not get an FDA-approved coronavirus vaccine. That's down from a peak of 50% in September, but remains a concerning number for public health officials who want to get Covid-19 under control.

There are several reasons why the public's confidence is cracking harder than an iPhone screen on concrete.

  • 37% of respondents who said they wouldn't get vaccinated are worried about a rushed timeline.
  • 26% want to wait until they confirm it's safe.
  • 12% don't trust vaccines generally. 

That's despite nine pharmaceutical companies, including frontrunners Moderna and Pfizer, pledging to hold their products to "high ethical standards and sound scientific principles."

  • Dr. Fauci has also tried reassuring the public that the process "did not compromise at all safety nor did it compromise scientific integrity."

Zoom out: At the very end of the Covid-19 vaccine's supply chain are injectees, and the WHO estimates 60%–80% of them need to be immune for a population to hit herd immunity. Establishing public trust in these vaccines will be the next major challenge for health officials.