January 07, 2014
Obama Quit In Afghanistan
Tear out the front page! Here is a shocker from former SecDef Gates, as reported by Bob Woodward:
So Obama was sending our young men and women off to a meat grinder with no real confidence in the likelihood of success. How like Lyndon Johnson [see AND McNAMARA, below].
Here is the NY Times version:
I wish these two could agree on the timing of Gates' insight - per the Times, the "all about getting out" moment was March 2011; per Woodward,
...by early 2010 he had concluded the president “doesn’t believe in his own strategy, and doesn’t consider the war to be his. For him, it’s all about getting out.”
Well. I was saying the same thing back in September 2009. Activate the auto-quote:
And again in July 2010, which may or may not have put me ahead of Gates in ruminating about Obama's goals in Afghanistan:
Yeah, Obama lacked commitment to victory in Afghanistan, and in a subsequent post I noticed that the sun rises in the East (and the sky was blue!). There is no way it took Gates until March 2011 to figure that out.
CAN WE IGNORE A SWIPE AT HILLARY? From Woodward:
Wow, Hillary's opposition to the surge was political? Just like her support of the AUMF in 2002 was political. Which makes this genius wrong twice.
As a timesaver, future writers might just want to list the decisions Hillary made that were not political. Put them in the World's Shortest
Books collection.
AND McNAMARA: The NY Times editors, by way of Cecil Turner, offered their thoughts on McNamara's pursuit of a Vietnam strategy in which he did not believe:
Obama has nothing to worry about from that quarter, obviously; it's hard to imagine liberal fashion changing that dramatically.
In a new memoir, former defense secretary
Robert Gates unleashes harsh judgments about President Obama’s
leadership and his commitment to the Afghanistan war, writing that by
early 2010 he had concluded the president “doesn’t believe in his own
strategy, and doesn’t consider the war to be his. For him, it’s all
about getting out.”
Leveling one of the more serious charges
that a defense secretary could make against a commander in chief sending
forces into combat, Gates asserts that Obama had more than doubts about
the course he had charted in Afghanistan. The president was “skeptical
if not outright convinced it would fail,” Gates writes in “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War.”
So Obama was sending our young men and women off to a meat grinder with no real confidence in the likelihood of success. How like Lyndon Johnson [see AND McNAMARA, below].
Here is the NY Times version:
Obama Lost Faith in His Afghan Strategy, Book Asserts
In His New Memoir, Robert M. Gates, the Former Defense Secretary, Offers a Critique of the President
By THOM SHANKER
WASHINGTON — After ordering a troop
increase in Afghanistan, President Obama eventually lost faith in the
strategy, his doubts fed by White House advisers who continually brought
him negative news reports suggesting it was failing, according to his
former defense secretary Robert M. Gates.
In a new memoir, Mr. Gates, a Republican
holdover from the Bush administration who served for two years under Mr.
Obama, praises the president as a rigorous thinker who frequently made
decisions “opposed by his political advisers or that would be unpopular
with his fellow Democrats.” But Mr. Gates says that by 2011, Mr. Obama
began criticizing — sometimes emotionally — the way his policy in
Afghanistan was playing out.
At a pivotal meeting in the situation
room in March 2011, called to discuss the withdrawal timetable, Mr.
Obama opened with a blast of frustration — expressing doubts about Gen.
David H. Petraeus, the commander he had chosen, and questioning whether
he could do business with the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai.
“As I sat there, I thought: The
president doesn’t trust his commander, can’t stand Karzai, doesn’t
believe in his own strategy and doesn’t consider the war to be his,” Mr.
Gates wrote. “For him, it’s all about getting out.”
I wish these two could agree on the timing of Gates' insight - per the Times, the "all about getting out" moment was March 2011; per Woodward,
...by early 2010 he had concluded the president “doesn’t believe in his own strategy, and doesn’t consider the war to be his. For him, it’s all about getting out.”
Well. I was saying the same thing back in September 2009. Activate the auto-quote:
Briefly, I think Obama escalated in
Afghanistan for political show - he wanted to back his famous 2002
anti-Iraq war speech about not being opposed to all wars, just dumb ones
with some suitably fierce rhetoric, so he campaigned on the notion that
we had to abandon Iraq and win on the real battlefield of Afghanistan,
despite the many obvious obstacle to success....
[A]s of January 20 2009 the US had better
chances for something like a victory in Iraq than in Afghanistan, but
Obama has remained committed to pursuing the lesser chance. For now -
who doubts that the anti-war left will turn on the Afghan adventure and
Obama will be quick to blame Bush and turn with them?
And again in July 2010, which may or may not have put me ahead of Gates in ruminating about Obama's goals in Afghanistan:
Plenty of progressives are wondering what
happened to that nice lefty they voted for, and are wondering when his
inner dove will fly forth. Believe me, plenty of righties are wondering
the same thing.
My official editorial position is that if
we had Lincoln in the White House, the Afghani equivalent of George
Washington in Kabul, and Generals Marshall and Eisenhower peering at
maps of Kandahar, we might still lose in Afghanistan. Gen. Petraeus is a
great general and a great American, but he is not partnered with
Lincoln and Washington.
Conversely, we might be lucky enough to
win even without a President committed to victory, but I don't think it
is worth the chance. It's too late now, but it would have been better
if Obama had never escalated the war.
Yeah, Obama lacked commitment to victory in Afghanistan, and in a subsequent post I noticed that the sun rises in the East (and the sky was blue!). There is no way it took Gates until March 2011 to figure that out.
CAN WE IGNORE A SWIPE AT HILLARY? From Woodward:
Gates offers a catalogue of various
meetings, based in part on notes that he and his aides made at the time,
including an exchange between Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary
Rodham Clinton that he calls “remarkable.”
He writes: “Hillary told the president
that her opposition to the [2007] surge in Iraq had been political
because she was facing him in the Iowa primary. . . . The president
conceded vaguely that opposition to the Iraq surge had been political.
To hear the two of them making these admissions, and in front of me, was
as surprising as it was dismaying.”
Wow, Hillary's opposition to the surge was political? Just like her support of the AUMF in 2002 was political. Which makes this genius wrong twice.
As a timesaver, future writers might just want to list the decisions Hillary made that were not political. Put them in the World's Shortest
Books collection.
AND McNAMARA: The NY Times editors, by way of Cecil Turner, offered their thoughts on McNamara's pursuit of a Vietnam strategy in which he did not believe:
“Mr. McNamara must not escape the lasting
moral condemnation of his countrymen,” The New York Times said in a
widely discussed editorial, written by the page’s editor at the time,
Howell Raines. “Surely he must in every quiet and prosperous moment hear
the ceaseless whispers of those poor boys in the infantry, dying in the
tall grass, platoon by platoon, for no purpose. What he took from them
cannot be repaid by prime-time apology and stale tears, three decades
late.”
Obama has nothing to worry about from that quarter, obviously; it's hard to imagine liberal fashion changing that dramatically.
Do you need to increase your credit score?
ReplyDeleteDo you intend to upgrade your school grade?
Do you want to hack your cheating spouse Email, whats app, Facebook, Instagram or any social network?
Do you need any information concerning any database.
Do you need to retrieve deleted files?
Do you need to clear your criminal records or DMV?
Do you want to remove any site or link from any blog?
you should contact this hacker, he is reliable and good at the hack jobs..
contact : onlineghosthacker247@gmail.com