Kamala Slammed for Disrespectful Memorialday Tweet
Kamala a Little Tardy in Cover-Over
Monday, May 31, 2021
Sunday, May 30, 2021
George Floyd - African American Iconic Hero
According to the Socialist Democrats and their leftist media groupies, until the end, George was a model citizen.
After 6 burglaries, 3 car thefts, multiple illegal trespasses, an ongoing cocaine and alcohol addiction, committing 2 violent home invasions, 3 armed robberies, dealing Fentanyl and Meth, passing counterfeit money, beating 4 victims senseless and being arrested 23 times since 1998, George Floyd hasn't committed a crime in over a year now!BUT IT DID NET HIS FAMILY $27 MILLION!
Saturday, May 29, 2021
Comparing 911 to Jan 6th :A Travesty
Comparing 911 to Jan 6th :A Travesty
It’s a Travesty to Compare the Capitol Siege to 9/11
More than 3,000 children never saw their parents again. On Jan. 6, Congress returned within hours.
Thursday, May 27, 2021
Democrats' Pre-Election Lies Are Unraveling
The Morning Briefing: Democrats' Pre-Election Lies Are Unraveling
Top O’ the Briefing
Happy Thursday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. My Liberace action figures are all in their original boxes.
Try as I might, I just can’t block last year out of my head. I’m going to need some sort of medically-induced coma to be able to pull that off. Rather than continuing the futile effort of avoiding it, I spend my time picking it apart, trying to see if I can pinpoint the exact moment that it all went awry. I’m writing a book that recaps the madness and it still seems as if I’m chronicling a bad dream. It couldn’t really have been that surreal, could it?
I keep checking, and I guess it was.
Despite four relentless years of the media lying intensely about him, Donald Trump was still poised to be re-elected as we headed into 2020. Then the infernal Wuhan Chinese Bat Flu hit and the Democrats immediately sniffed opportunity.
The centerpiece of their early attacks on Trump involved painting him — and by extension his supporters — as a RAAAAAACIST liar for suggesting that the coronavirus came from a lab in Wuhan. From there they built the house of lies that enabled the race to become close enough for them pull whatever shenanigans they did in November that got us to this point.
We entered a truly disturbing and bizarre phase where the American mainstream media was willing to take at face value any claims made by agents of the Chinese Communist Party, all the while rejecting and denigrating anything that was said by the president of the United States. It was a new low even for that group of professional bottom-dwellers.
As my colleagues over at Townhall noted yesterday, some in the media weren’t behaving like lapdogs for the CCP:
Throughout 2020, as the China virus spread across the globe, infecting millions and killing hundreds of thousands, Townhall reported on the latest information about COVID-19’s spread, President Trump’s plan to defeat it and his efforts to develop new treatments, and most importantly, reminded readers where the virus originated: Wuhan, China.
While Townhall reported on those questioning the lies coming from the Chinese communist government and the scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology about the coronavirus leaking from a lab, the left-wing media, Democrats, and Dr. Fauci bought into the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda and anyone asking questions about a potential lab leak was labeled a conspiracy theorist.
Now, the Left and the Democrat Media Complex are changing their tune, saying that the lab leak theory has some credibility, but we were reporting the facts and real news first
PJ Media did as well.
There were also many of us who weren’t Fauci fans from the get-go. He looks more and more dodgy by the day now.
The pandemic was a godsend to Biden and the Democrat Media Complex knew it. It gave him a one-note campaign. He didn’t have to grasp and talk about complex policy issues. He had an excuse to abandon the rigors of a presidential campaign and stay home and make the occasional video appearance from his basement. All he had to do was bark, “Trump! Virus! Bad!” and DOCTOR Mommy Jill would let him get back to his Legos.
Dem-friendly media of both the mainstream and social variety went to work feverishly to make the magic happen for Drooling Joe. They continued to discredit Trump and his supporters whenever they told the truth about the virus. Facebook decided that it was in the business of deciding what was and was not truth. The platform began yanking any content that went against the approved Democratic pandemic narrative.
There’s been a bit of a shift on that front too:
On Wednesday, Facebook ended its ban on posts claiming that COVID-19 was man-made, a spokesman told Politico. Facebook had previously decreed that the man-made virus theory had been debunked.
“In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made from our apps,” Facebook said in a statement. “We’re continuing to work with health experts to keep pace with the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge.”
The “new facts” line is rich. The facts were there in the beginning, they were just inconvenient for what Facebook was trying to achieve for Joe Biden.
It wasn’t just the truth about the plague that Zuckerberg and Company had to sweep under the rug. There was also the matter of Biden’s sleazebag cocaine freak son Hunter. When the really bad news about him broke late in the campaign, Zuckey, Dorsey, and the rest of the Hitler Youth began shutting down anyone who truthfully reported it. We were told that it was a nothingburger of a story and that Biden was the most innocent of lambs when it came to any of the Burisma stuff.
Tyler wrote yesterday that that bit of fiction is falling apart now too:
According to documents on the laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a repair shop in Delaware, Hunter introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to an executive at the notoriously corrupt Ukrainian gas firm Burisma at a dinner in Washington, D.C. Burisma was paying Hunter Biden $83,333 per month to sit on the firm’s board. Hunter’s Russian and Kazakh business partners also attended the dinner.
Hunter Biden invited guests to the dinner on April 16, 2015, held in the private “Garden Room” at Café Milano, a Georgetown restaurant whose catchphrase is, “Where the world’s most powerful people go.” The New York Post first reported on the emails on Wednesday.
The next day, Vadym Pozharskyi, an executive at Burisma, emailed Hunter Biden to thank him for introducing his father.
When they weren’t lying outright, they were actively suppressing the truth. We’ve all got opinions on how many legitimate votes Joe Biden received last November (LOL at 81 million) but one thing is very obvious now: however many people actually did vote for him did so without complete or honest information.
Of course, the Dems and the MSM are all safe from repercussions now. The Oval Office fix is in, and even they know that Ol’ Gropes isn’t going be running again, no matter what his wife keeps telling him to say. Naturally, the mainstream media won’t be reporting on how awfully the mainstream media behaved to get Biden elected.
In parting, let me say that all of this really isn’t doing much for my skepticism about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election.
Wednesday, May 26, 2021
It's Always Been About - Wuhan
RICHARD FERNANDEZ:
The return of the lab origin theory.
“Why are Biden and the media suddenly open to the former “conspiracy theory” of a lab origin of the coronavirus pandemic. First it was never purely a conspiracy theory. From the beginning many reputable experts urged the possibility be investigated. What may be happening is the tide is turning within the bureaucratic scientific establishment. As we learn more about the virus and the so-called missing link continues to be missing it is becoming increasingly difficult to blithely accept the original MSM assurance.”
Systemic Marxism: Biden Admin Allows BLM flags to Fly on Federal Buildings
Systemic Marxism: Biden Admin Allows BLM flags to Fly on Federal Buildings
The war on police has been brutal and now it’s insulting. In a time when a pro-2nd Amendment police captain was fired for supporting constitutional carry legislature, a Virginia police lieutenant was fired for donating to Kyle Rittenhouse’s defense fund, and a DEA agent was fired for being in the capital, (not the capitol), on January 6th, the State Department is giving the thumbs up to fly the BLM flag.
An anonymous source from Biden’s State Dept. leaked a memo that indicates, “diplomatic and consular posts,” are free to fly BLM flags and banners today, May 25th and beyond, in honor of the one-year anniversary of the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
The memo, first reported by Jack Posobiec on humanevents.com states, “The Department supports the use of the term ‘Black Lives Matter’ in messaging content, speeches, and other diplomatic engagements with foreign audiences to advance racial equity and access to justice on May 25th and beyond. We encourage posts to focus on the need to eliminate systemic racism and its continued impact.”
It continues, “May 25 marks one year since the brutal murder of George Floyd by police officers in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Last year, the horrific video of Mr. Floyd’s final 9 minutes and 29 seconds went viral and spurred Black Lives Matter protests worldwide, in response to his senseless killing and to demand an end to systemic racism and police brutality. One year later, many in the international community will honor Mr. Floyd and acknowledge the long journey nations face to advance racial justice. Leading up to May 25, the Department has issued guidance on the use of Black Lives Matter language, banners, and flags.”
The entire memo is here.
This comes after a solid year of nationwide BLM-backed violence, with the help of their non-binary siblings in antifa. Minneapolis alone saw roughly 700 buildings damaged after the death of George Floyd. A year of rioting has cost Portland, Oregon, taxpayers more than $12 million dollars. Roughly 20% of Seattle’s police force quit after last year’s chaos.
Despite the year of carnage, the U.S. embassy in Spain is displaying the Black Lives Matter flag from its roof.
Jack Posobiec writes, “Despite the documented actions of BLM protestors during the riots of 2020, and despite the New York Times reporting on their organization’s declining popularity with American voters, our federal government has nonetheless decided to endorse and promote an organization with admitted Marxist roots as one having ties to our official foreign offices.”
Yet another insult to cops, when the Biden administration backs BLM’s beliefs in police brutality and systemic racism, even though body cams show us something else.
Self-described Marxist and co-founder of BLM, Patrisse Cullors, recently purchased her fourth mansion on money donated to BLM, and is currently looking at property in the Bahamas.
New Hampshire, Auditor Says 60% Error Rate “Way Higher Than We Expected”
New Hampshire - Possible 60& vote error
Windham, New Hampshire, Auditor Says 60% Error Rate “Way Higher Than We Expected” – President Trump Reacts
The January 6th commission. - TANGLE
I’m Isaac Saul, and this is Tangle: an independent, ad-free, subscriber-supported politics newsletter that summarizes the best arguments from across the political spectrum — then “my take.” You can read Tangle for free or subscribe for Friday editions, and you can reach me anytime by replying to this email. If someone sent you this email, they’re asking you to sign up. You can do that by clicking here.
Today’s read: 11 minutes.
The January 6th commission. Plus, a Tangle raffle and a reader question about masks.
 |
Wednesday giveaway.
Let’s try something fun. Before 11 a.m. EST tomorrow, if you share Tangle on social media, or send an email to 5+ friends/colleagues/family members asking them to subscribe, I’ll enter you to win a $50 gift card to a business of your choice. All you have to do is take a screenshot of your post or email, then reply to this newsletter and send it in. Anyone who sends a screenshot between now and 11:00 a.m. EST tomorrow will be entered into the competition, and I’ll announce the winner in tomorrow’s newsletter!
You can share this link: https://www.readtangle.com/
You can email Tangle to friends by clicking here.
Or click the button below for social:
Reader feedback.
There was a lot of great feedback to yesterday’s newsletter on critical race theory. Some of it, frankly, persuasive enough to move my position a bit. I don’t think you’ll ever see me supporting outright bans on teaching certain critical theories in schools, but many readers made a strong case about a) the damage CRT teaching is doing in their communities and b) the fact there are better alternatives for anti-racism training. Here’s one such note:
“The thing is, you could have had all those eye-opening experiences through diversity trainings that were not based in CRT!” Kira from New Jersey said. “Chloe Valdary's Theory of Enchantment is a prime example of an antiracism training that is not founded in CRT. CRT is, in fact, skeptical of empathy as a means to reduce racist attitudes (see ‘empathetic fallacy’ on the CRT Wikipedia page; I have also seen this viewpoint in action). The training that was done where I used to work seemed to sow division, awkwardness, and paranoia rather than fostering compassion and empathy… Of all the issues out there, I really wish there was a space for ‘other’ in terms of what the ‘left’ and ‘right’ are saying. I'm generally a lefty, but I feel so far afield from most of the vocal liberals on this issue.”
Quick hits.
A U.S. aircraft carrier is leaving Asia to help accelerate the Afghanistan troop withdrawal. (Wall Street Journal, subscription)
Roman Protasevich, the Belarusian journalist and dissident who was taken off a diverted passenger airliner earlier this week, appeared in a video “confessing” to organizing mass riots. Experts say the video shows signs of coercion and torture. (The Washington Post, subscription)
President Biden will meet Vladimir Putin face to face in mid-June (The New York Times, subscription). Meanwhile, Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Israel and pushed for U.S. aid to rebuild Gaza. (The New York Times, subscription)
New York prosecutors convened a special grand jury to consider evidence in a criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump’s business dealings. (Fox News)
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has significantly scaled back its street-level enforcement under President Biden, carrying out fewer than 3,000 deportations last month, the lowest level on record. (The Washington Post, subscription)
What D.C. is talking about.
January 6. In recent months, Democrats have been pushing for a 9/11-style commission to investigate the riots at the Capitol on January 6. The commission would be a 10-person body that would investigate the cause of the riot, as well as the events that led up to it. The riot caused some 140 injuries and tens of millions of dollars of damage. Five people also died on January 6, including a woman shot by a Capitol police officer, though two died of natural causes and one — Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick — suffered a stroke after engaging rioters. Two other Capitol police officers committed suicide in the days after.
Last week, 35 Republicans in the House of Representatives joined Democrats to vote in favor of establishing the investigatory commission. Four-fifths of House Republicans opposed the commission, but it passed with a 252-to-175 vote. Democrats argued the commission was crucial to understanding what happened that day, and the independent commission would make suggestions for better securing the Capitol and preventing similar events in the future.
Former President Trump urged Republicans not to vote for the commission, calling it a “Democrat trap.” Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) opposed the bill, saying several committees were already investigating the day’s events and noting that $10 million has been allocated to improve Capitol security.
The bill is now in the Senate, where the commission is facing stiff opposition after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced his opposition to the bill, and colleagues quickly fell in line. McConnell suggested the bill could interfere with criminal cases and raised concerns that a Democratic chairman would control staff hiring (even though the commission would be split evenly between Republicans and Democrats). Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said he planned to force a vote on the commission.
Below, we’ll take a look at some reactions from the right and left.
What the right is saying.
The right mostly opposes the commission, arguing that it is a partisan effort to tie all Republicans to the riots.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board said the commission “could be useful if it answered outstanding questions and agreed on a common set of facts about events,” but the prospects for that are “none and slimmer.”
“Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been driving this idea, and she has a record of using these commissions for partisan ends. Her goal here is to drive her narrative that the riot was a planned attempted coup, and to run on that theme to keep the House in 2022…But hidden in the fine print are tools empowering Democrats,” it said. “The bill gives the chairman unilateral authority to demand information from federal agencies and appoint senior staff. ‘Thanks to powers invested in the Chairperson alone, the Democratically-appointed members would have significant control over the direction of the investigation’ and the ability to stop GOP members from ‘engaging in mischief,’ New York University law professor Ryan Goodman reassured a Washington Post writer… Multiple investigations of the Jan. 6 events are already underway… Unless a commission could work together, its effort would be redundant.”
In Newsweek, Ben Weingarten said the commission is part of a “rolling effort to exploit the inexcusable, pathetic and disgraceful actions of several hundred people to further the narrative that up to half the country constitutes would-be or potential domestic terrorists.”
“But perhaps most disturbing is this: The proposed commission is to be charged with investigating and reporting upon, in part, ‘the influencing factors that fomented such [an] attack on American representative democracy while engaged in a constitutional process.’ In pursuit of this effort, it ‘may secure directly from any Federal department or agency information, including any underlying information that may be in the possession of the intelligence community, that is necessary to enable it to carry out its purposes and functions.’
“The danger herein is obvious,” Weingarten said. “This commission would give partisans the ability to use the full powers of the federal government to investigate their wrong thinking political foes. ‘Influencing factors that fomented such [an] attack’ are, of course, virtually limitless. Are you a politician who dared question the legitimacy of any aspect whatsoever of the 2020 presidential election? Are you a think tank that pointed out any of the anomalies in that contest? Are you a law firm that litigated against state executives and administrators who made election law over and above state legislatures themselves? Are you a media organization that printed stories covering these themes, or a social media maven who promoted them? Why would we assume anything other than all of the above, and more, would end up in the commission's crosshairs?”
In Deseret News, Samuel Benson had a different take, saying Republicans were moving on from the commission “at their own peril.”
“McConnell claims it’s a ‘slanted’ and ‘unbalanced’ proposal, one born in ‘partisan bad faith.’ Sen. Marco Rubio opposes it, even though he hasn’t read the bill. Sen. Josh Hawley is upset it doesn’t investigate violent Black Lives Matter protests throughout 2020, too. And Sen. Ron Johnson now claims Jan. 6 was just a largely ‘peaceful protest.’ As of now, Sen. Mitt Romney stands as the lone Republican senator committed to voting for the commission,” Benson wrote.
“An investigation is wise on its merits, but there are also sound, partisan reasons for a Jan. 6 commission. It’s exactly what the Republican Party, neck-deep in an identity crisis, needs to restore the American public’s confidence in the party,” he added. “Setting the record straight on one of the party’s darkest days will serve, at best, as a means to successfully move on from the issue. It’s an opportunity to address the matter and show penitence where appropriate, thereby winning back disgruntled Americans who gave up on the party after the Jan. 6 events. In the days following Jan. 6, at least 140,000 Republicans in 25 states changed their party affiliations, and it’s likely tens of thousands more in other states did the same. Such a large-scale exodus is very unusual, political scientists say, and it poses a serious threat to the GOP and the success of its message. Conservative lawmakers should be seeking to find a way to regain the trust of those who left the party but may yet return.”
What the left is saying.
The left supports the commission, arguing that it’s a necessary step towards understanding the events of that day — and preventing a similar event from happening again.
In Vox, Andrew Prokop pointed out that Republicans were the ones who suggested the idea for a commission in the first place — only to make an about-face.
“Republicans have evidently calculated that such a commission’s findings would likely hurt their party’s electoral prospects,” Prokop wrote. “Some even admit this: ‘Anything that gets us rehashing the 2020 election, I think, is a day lost on being able to draw contrast between us and the Democrats’ very radical left-wing agenda,’ Senate Minority Whip John Thune told reporters last week… Even though Republicans would likely be able to prevent a bipartisan 1/6 commission from achieving much of substance, they’d really prefer not to have one at all.
“That’s because, as Thune admitted above and as Liz Cheney’s ouster shows, party strategists view any discussion of Trump’s attempt to overturn the election result as a harmful issue for their party at this point,” Prokop said. “They want to make the 2022 elections about Biden and Democrats, not Trump… The GOP base is out of step with public opinion on this issue. So they’d really like it to just go away.”
In New York Magazine, Jonathan Chait criticized Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the Republican House leader, for opposing the commission.
“McCarthy’s putative reasons for rejecting the commission boil down to two main points,” Chait said. “First, he calls the hearing ‘duplicative,’ citing an ongoing criminal investigation by the Justice Department and hearings in the Senate Homeland Security Committee. McCarthy has not previously evinced much concern over the damage of duplicative hearings, having supported ten investigations into Benghazi, six of them in the House, the last of which he frankly described as an effort to damage Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers.”
“Second, he claims that the January 6 investigation fails to appropriately emphasize the events he wishes to use as deflections,” Chait added. “It ‘ignores the political violence that has struck American cities, a Republican Congressional baseball practice, and, most recently, the deadly attack on Capitol Police on April 2, 2021.’ It is true that this investigation of a violent insurrection by the president’s allies, intending to pressure Congress to overturn the election results and hand the sitting president an unelected second term, does not principally focus on other, different violent episodes. The September 11 Commission did not get into the Oklahoma City bombings or the invasion of Grenada. Street gangs taking advantage of protests to loot stores, or mentally ill loners attempting to kill politicians are different problems than a president attempting to cancel an election because he lost.”
In The Washington Post, Greg Sargent laid out the five “ludicrous” reasons Republicans oppose the commission and deconstructed them: “1) The commission is too “partisan.”… 2) The timing is all wrong… 3) The commission has been hijacked by politics… 4) The commission should also focus on police protests… 5) Other existing committees should do this.”
“This will generate lots of outrage,” Sargent wrote. “But that isn’t the right sentiment. It implies that on this matter, Republicans can be shamed into following latent principles that they might otherwise adhere to if criticism of them is pointed enough. But their excuses are so untethered from anything remotely resembling good-faith argumentation that no such presumption is deserved. A better response is to point out that Republicans oppose the commission because it will incriminate them, and that their phony justifications are merely about obscuring this truth — and nothing more.”
My take.
It’s a pretty depressing spectacle.
The day after the January 6 riots, I wrote that it was the end of Trump’s political career, that he had successfully ended our streak of peaceful transfers of power, and that the mob storming the Capitol would go down as one of the more shameful days in American history. Trump’s influence on the party has not yet waned, but the rest of it holds true.
Do I think this was some kind of coup? No. Is this anything like 9/11 or Pearl Harbor? Of course not. Those comparisons are overblown. Was it domestic terrorism? The FBI defines that as “violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.” You be the judge. Was it an insurrection? That’s defined as “a violent uprising against an authority or government.” Again: I don’t think it’s nutty to say these events fit that definition.
Whatever you want to call it, here’s what I’d say: a bunch of buffoons collectively stormed one of the most sacred places in our nation’s capital, ransacked offices, beat up police, caused millions of dollars of damage and compelled Capitol Police to use deadly force to protect our elected representatives (even if there’s a reasonable debate about whether that force was necessary). It might have been a spontaneous decision to storm the building, but it didn’t spring forth from nothing. The mob very clearly stated their intent to injure or kill members of Congress — out loud, on video, on social media. Weeks of events and planning around the rally led to the riot. And a lot of money was involved in making it all happen.
So I think it’s worthy of a commission.
Yes, there are other investigations. And yes, I’m concerned about our spy agencies overreaching on claims of domestic terrorism and concerned about how rioters are being treated in jail. But the Congressional committees are almost singularly focused on boosting Capitol security, and it’s the Justice Department that is responsible for nailing down criminal charges. Other important questions about that day still linger: was this an organized plan or spontaneous looting? Were members of Congress involved in any way, shape or form, besides perpetuating the lie of a stolen election? What about the pipe bombs planted the night before? What about the riot’s exposure of the vulnerability of hard copy electoral ballots? And of course, why were the Capitol Police so understaffed and underprepared, and the National Guard so slow to respond?
Democrats are going to try to centralize power on the commission. I’m not going to pretend there aren’t political calculations being made on the left. That’s how it always goes. But at least they’re standing on solid ground. The bill text on staff hiring for the commission is identical to the 9/11 commission, as Susan Collins suggested, and identical to that of a Jan 6 commission Republicans proposed shortly after the riots. Even if the House bill isn’t satisfactory, that’s the point of sending it to the Senate. Propose amendments. Negotiate. Change the bill.
Instead, Republicans are planning to filibuster. And for what? 65 percent of the public wants an independent commission, including 37 percent of Republicans. 52 percent already believe Trump is solely or mainly to blame for January 6. The politics of investigating it might be bad, but the politics of ignoring it could be far worse.
In today’s media climate, you have two options: lean on investors and ads or ask for reader support. Tangle is choosing the latter, because we want the stakeholders of this project — and this work — to be you, our readers, not advertisers or investors. To support us, all we ask is that you commit $50/year, just $4.16 a month or 98 cents a week, to subscribe.
Blindspot report.
Tangle has very few partners because we are very careful about who we work with. And one of them is Ground News, an exceptional app and website that tracks the political bias in news reporting. I feature parts of Ground News’s “Blindspot Report” in Tangle. The Blindspot Report tells you what you were likely to miss based on your political leanings and the news feed bubble you’ve created for yourself.
If you’re on the left, you probably missed the story of Dr. Anthony Fauci saying he was no longer confident COVID-19 emerged naturally.
If you’re on the right, you probably missed the story of the Trump administration secretly obtaining a CNN reporter’s phone and email records.
Want to check out Ground News’s bias ratings, blindspot reports or other news sources? Click here.
Your questions, answered.
Q: I've seen some comments from people saying things like "I'll continue wearing a mask to avoid being labeled a Republican.” While I think it's mainly a joke, do you think there is some underlying truth to this? Will the mask become just another way to virtue signal rather than "listening to the science"?
— Chris, Philadelphia, PA
Tangle: I think the vast, vast majority of people — liberals included — don’t like wearing masks. And if they are wearing one, I suspect there’s probably a good reason for it. My advice would be to proceed with caution. Some people are immunocompromised, some people are unvaccinated (for a myriad of reasons), some people are simply traumatized from the last year and not ready to take it off. I know there have been some articles about the “forever maskers,” too, who seem to find comfort in the face covering. Masks are, after all, quite common in other parts of the world.
I’m sure there are some people putting on their masks to signal their political ideology and the fact they are “not a Republican.” That strikes me as extremely childish and silly. Regardless, I don’t think it’s going to be particularly common (I’d venture to say that in a few months, it’ll be exceedingly rare).
Now that I’m fully vaccinated, I am not wearing my mask anywhere it’s not mandated. I went to my best friend’s wedding on Saturday and did not wear a mask. I ate dinner indoors last night, maskless (need your mouth for food), then went to the Brooklyn Nets playoff game (which was absolutely glorious). I went to the gym on Monday for the first time since March of 2020. It was a “mask optional” setting and I chose not to wear one. I’m healthy, relatively young, fully vaccinated and blessed enough not to need a mask — I’d prefer not face-sweating and smelling my own breath all day, so I’m pretty much done with them.
But I’m also going to be respectful. At the height of the pandemic, I was disheartened to see how many people refused to wear masks. Nevertheless, I never demanded anyone put one on or wear one around me. I just avoided them. It was a scary time with lots of unknowns, and I had people in my life who were very high-risk, so I took every precaution I could. Now, I’m not going to question anyone who takes a while to remove the mask — or those who may wear it for years to come. If they want to keep it on, it doesn’t impact me at all, and I’m sure they’ve got their reasons.
A story that matters.
More foreign-born Americans are moving to the center of the U.S. than in past years, according to a new report by the Heartland Forward. Population growth in the U.S. is slower than it’s been in a century, but industries across America are relying more on immigrant workers now than in years past. “The report's findings counter perceptions that immigrants tend to settle on the coasts ‘because they're not welcome’ in the middle of the country,” Axios reported. “Those invested in the region believe there's a case to be made for attracting immigrants of all skill levels to the country's geographic middle.” (Axios)
Numbers.
37%. The percentage of conservativeRepublicans who support the formation of a bipartisan Congressional commission to investigate the January 6 attack.
55%. The percentage of moderateRepublicans who support the formation of a bipartisan Congressional commission to investigate the January 6 attack.
86%. The percentage of moderate Democrats who support the formation of a bipartisan Congressional commission to investigate the January 6 attack.
97%. The percentage of liberal Democrats who support the formation of a bipartisan Congressional commission to investigate the January 6 attack.
$110 million. The amount of new funding for Palestinians announced by Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
2 million. The number of people who evacuated an Indian coast in preparation for a storm.
Reminder.
Share Tangle with a call out to subscribe before 11 a.m. EST tomorrow, send in a screenshot, and you’ll be entered to win a $50 gift card. Subscribe to Tangle to support our work by clicking here.
Have a nice day.
For the first time in more than 3,000 years, a baby Tasmanian devil was born in the wilds of mainland Australia. In 2020, 26 Tasmanian devils were set free on a 1,000-acre sanctuary in Barrington Tops. The home is designed to protect them from some long-time rivals, as well as fires and disease. But it’s the Tasmanian devil’s natural habitat, and they were effectively left to their own devices with only hopes that they would breed. “We have been working tirelessly for the better part of 10 years to return devils to the wild of mainland Australia with the hope that they would establish a sustainable population,” Tim Faulkner, president of Aussie Ark, said. “Once they were back in the wild, it was up to them, which was nerve wracking. We had been watching them from afar until it was time to step in and confirm the birth of our first wild joeys. And what a moment it was!”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)