The Anti-Semitism In Anti-Whiteness: Whoopi Goldberg just brought it out into the open.

 ANDREW SULLIVAN: 

The Anti-Semitism In Anti-Whiteness: Whoopi Goldberg just brought it out into the open.

So here we go! Anti-Semitism is seen as not racism, because for Whoopi, and critical theorists, “racism” is defined as an essentially Euro-American social construction, which didn’t exist before the colonial era, and only applies to powerful whites (and fellow travelers) vis-a-vis powerless blacks. Racism is not, for them, a universal, instinctual, tribal, evolution-rooted suspicion of different-looking others that is always with us, and can happen anywhere. It is solely rather the deliberate, historically contingent oppression of the non-white by colonial “white supremacy.” However much truth this contains about American history (and it does contain a lot of it), it’s a terribly parochial view that misses a huge amount in the world, throughout history, and in America.

As Adam Serwer explains, this parochial view of racism also “renders the anti-Semitism that led to the Holocaust illegible.” Well, yeah. Any theory of racism that cannot explain the Holocaust is not just illegible, it is untenable. . . .

Whoopi’s gaffe helps explain why the mainstream media now describes young black men assaulting Jews and Asians as expressing … “white supremacy”! This is what the WaPo op-ed page, referring to growing Latino support for Trump, called “multiracial whiteness.” If they are non-white and bigots, they miraculously become white. And notice how bigotry is exclusively ascribed to a single “race”: whites. Without whites, we’d have no racism at all.

Well, that’s the goal, basically.

Related:

 While Watching ‘The View’ In Hell, Hitler Surprised To Learn Holocaust Wasn’t About Race.

 “I was very explicit in my writings and speeches! I compared the Jews to rats and to germs! I appealed to social Darwinism and eugenics on a constant basis to justify everything I did for the master Aryan race! How could this Whoopi Goldberg not pick up what I was laying down!?”

I’m certainly not surprised that they have The View in Hell.

288Posted at 9:00 am by Glenn Reynolds   

R

Biden blocked the first Black woman from the Supreme Court.

 PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE TRUNALIMUNUMAPRZURE: 

Biden blocked the first Black woman from the Supreme Court. 

“Today, Biden calls the filibuster a 

‘relic of the Jim Crow era.’

 But he threatened to use that relic as a tool to keep a Black woman who actually lived under Jim Crow off the highest court in the land. The irony is that now he wants to get rid of the filibuster, and claim credit for putting the first Black woman on the court. There were many conservatives on Bush’s shortlist whose legal philosophy Biden opposed. But Biden only promised to filibuster the one Black woman. Why? Perhaps a clue lies in another confirmation fight that Biden helped wage. In 2001, Democrats blocked the nomination of Miguel Estrada to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. According to internal strategy memos obtained by the Wall Street Journal, they targeted Estrada at the request of liberal interest groups who said Estrada was

 ‘especially dangerous’ 

because ‘he is Latino, and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment.’ They did not want Republicans to put the first Hispanic on the Supreme Court. So, Biden and his fellow Democrats killed Estrada’s nomination —

 the first appeals court nominee in history to be successfully filibustered. 

It paid off when President Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor as the first Hispanic justice. Democrats’ commitment to diversity is a ruse. Biden was willing to destroy the careers of an accomplished Latino lawyer and a respected Black female judge, and stop Republicans from putting either on the Supreme Court. For Democrats, it’s all about identity politics.”

 

11Posted at 8:22 am by Ed Driscoll   

K

DOJ Still Soft on 2020 Rioters

 DOJ Still Soft on 2020 Rioters

No matter how much the Biden regime and news media want Americans to forget what happened during the “social justice” protests of 2020, the public remembers. A poll taken last summer shows overwhelming support for investigations into the nationwide looting and rioting following the death of George Floyd, which caused an estimated $2 billion in damages and cost dozens of lives..

MARKETS: YEAR-TO-DATE Jan 31,2022

 

MARKETS: YEAR-TO-DATE

Nasdaq 13,770.57 -11.98%

S&P 4,431.85 -7.01%

Dow 34,725.47 -4.44%

10-Year 1.771% +25.7 bps

Bitcoin $37,939.43 -19.31%

Moderna $159.47 -37.21%

*Stock data as of market close, cryptocurrency data as of 7:00pm ET. Here's what these numbers mean.

Markets: Stocks will hope to find their sea legs this week after being tossed and turned during a period of high volatility. Biotech companies in particular are feeling queasy. The sector is off to its worst start to a year since 2016 and Moderna is the worst performer in the S&P 500. Geopolitics: The US Senate is preparing to unleash “the mother of all sanctions” on Russia should it decide to invade Ukraine, lawmakers said this weekend. NJ Senator Bob Menendez said negotiations on a final package were “on the one-yard line” and will target Russian sovereign debt, Russian banks, and other entities in order to cripple Russia’s economy.

Second American Civil War, Lost???

 Second American Civil War, Lost???

The truth is that the Second American Civil War is...almost over.  Unlike the first one, the Democrats appear to be a near lock to win.

In 2003, Joe Biden Filibustered and Voted Against Nomination of a Black Woman to the Federal Bench

BY RICK MORAN JAN 27, 2022 2:27 PM ET I

n 2003, then-President George W. Bush nominated Janice Rogers Brown, an associate justice on the California Supreme Court to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was the first black woman nominated for the federal bench.

 But Rogers Brown had a problem; she was a libertarian-conservative and refused to play ball with civil rights organizations.

One of her major decisions was a dissent in the case of forcing cigarette manufacturers to put warning labels on packs and cartons. A truly libertarian decision. She also attacked the New Deal, which gave us Social Security and other programs as “the triumph of our socialist revolution.” You can imagine the anger of her liberal colleagues over that one.

But Joe Biden, champion of civil rights and the president who has gloried in naming the first minorities to several positions in his administration, filibustered against her nomination and voted twice against her. When Biden had the chance to vote for a black woman, he declined.

Breitbart:

On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Ingraham Angle,” host Laura Ingraham contrasted President Joe Biden’s vow to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court to replace outgoing Justice Stephen Breyer with then-Sen. Biden’s opposition to and multiple filibusters of the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the federal bench by then-President George W. Bush in 2003 and 2005 and remarked that “race and gender, they only count if you’re thought to be a committed judicial activist, judicial leftist.”

Mark Levin interview with Peter Schweizer exposes $31 million in CCP money to the Biden

 CCP Owns Biden - Lock Him Up

January 24, 2022

Must-see TV: Mark Levin interview with Peter Schweizer exposes $31 million in CCP money to the Biden family and much more

By Thomas Lifson

 Sunday's edition of Life, Liberty, and Levin, the one-hour long-form interview show hosted by Mark Levin on Fox News, is essential viewing.  If you don't have just over a half-hour to watch the almost-complete show (embedded below), I strongly recommend that you spend a mere 3 minutes and 20 seconds watching a summary of Peter Schweizer's research findings on the Biden family's gigantic payday "for no discernible work" from corporate entities controlled by members of the CCP elite.