Showing posts with label Vote Fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vote Fraud. Show all posts

Friday, July 8, 2022

2020 Election ? and Niel Cavuto

 Subject: UNHINGED

One of the very few bad apple Communists at Fox News, Neil Cavuto today said that President Trump on January 6, 2021 “was clearly unhinged.”

I say that our real president, President Trump was no more “unhinged” with pure righteous anger than the millions of patriots in America who have fought for America against the very same kinds of Biden/Democrat types of Socialist regimes that my fellow United States soldiers and veterans have died fighting against throughout our entire American history, Vietnam included.

Ron Aragon

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Dear Not So Angry Reader Ron Aragon,

I was included among your group addressees a while back, so I reply now.

Neil Cavuto is not a bad-apple communist. Rather. he is a NeverTrump Romney conservative of the sort in 2008 and 2016 most of us conservatives voted for and supported as preferrable to Barack Obama’s neo-socialist agendas—but discovered in 2016 and 2020 the formula was not reciprocated.

That is, conservatives were told to hold their noses and cast ballots for John McCain and Mitt Romney—despite their inability to appeal to or show much interest in the working middle classes.

Most of did just that. But those who made such appeals in 2008 and 2016 later did all they could, either independently or with the Left, to defeat Trump in 2016 and 2020. Note that Trump’s agenda and actual record of governance mirror-imaged their own life-long supposed commitment to conservative values, ranging from opposition to abortion and ensuring conservative judicial picks to energy development and tough on crime policies.

Molly Hemingway has written extensively about your concerns with the 2020 elections, focusing rather on questions that have not been answered: why and how were voting laws changed (by court injunctions or bureaucratic fiats) in spring 2020 to override many of the state legislatures’ constitutional prerogatives to establish balloting laws?

And how did it happened that when balloting topped an all-time high of 102 million votes in 2020 not cast on election, through early and mail-in voting, that the states’ error rates, or rate of rejected ballots, plunged?

In some states, the change was radical, from 3-4 percent averages of rejection in prior years to .3-.4 in 2020. That begs the question—when you more than double the number of 2016 non-Election-Day ballots, why does the rejection rate (improper or incomplete signatures and addresses, names not matching up-to-date voter registration lists, outright fraudulent names, non-citizens, etc.) dip?

Common sense would dictate that when registrars were flooded with millions of new early and mail-in balloting, then they would be more careful to weed out masses of illegal ballots rather than become laxer?

In addition, Mark Zuckerberg reportedly infused nearly $420 million of what the Left calls “dark money” to appropriate the duties of registrars in key counties in one-side efforts to up leftwing participation and vote counting and de facto depress conservative voters.

He has never been called before any congressional committee to explain why and how his huge sums were intended to influence the voting, although Molly Ball in a Time essay bragged on what she called an election “conspiracy” of wealthy and powerful leftists to defeat Donald Trump by absorbing government control of voting in some areas and even modulating street demonstrations so as not to embarrass candidate Biden.

Victor Hanson

Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Arizona Woman Pleads Guilty to ‘Sophisticated’ Ballot Harvesting Scheme

 2020 Election Fraud


2020 Election: Arizona Woman Pleads Guilty to ‘Sophisticated’ Ballot Harvesting Scheme

By Gary Bai
 
June 3, 2022 Updated: June 4, 2022
0:006:08

An Arizona woman has pleaded guilty to using her position in the Democratic Party to illegally harvest ballots in a ballot abuse scheme.

Tuesday, October 19, 2021

Congres Not J6 Protesters

 

Our Representatives, Not J6 Protesters, Defile the ‘Sacred’ U.S. Capitol

When politics is your religion and government is your God, a public building is your church.

The four-hour disturbance at the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, according to Beltway aristocracy and the media, wasn’t a legitimate protest that turned violent in some areas—it was a sacrilege. Never mind that the building itself sustained minimal damage—early reports estimated $30 million for repairs but the actual figure is around $1 million—the real vandalism occurred when thousands of Americans wearing MAGA hats invaded the cathedral of government power occupied by America’s political deity.

And the alleged apostates are paying a dear price.

Since January 6, lawmakers, judges, and federal prosecutors have routinely described the Capitol building as holy ground. “To those who engaged in the gleeful desecration of this, our temple of democracy, American democracy, justice will be done,” Pelosi said after the breach. Representative Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Fla.) tweeted on January 6 that “the Capitol building is the center and sacred symbol of democracy.”

After the joint session reconvened later that evening, Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) mourned how “this sacred place was desecrated by a mob today, on our watch. This temple to democracy was defiled by thugs who roamed the halls.” Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.) thanked the first responders who protected “this sacred Chamber.”

Here is how Joe Biden’s Justice Department recently described the actions of Robert Reeder, a Maryland man whose life has been ruined since he was charged with four misdemeanors related to his participation in the January 6 protest: “The attack on the U.S. Capitol . . . was one of the only times in our history when the building was literally occupied by hostile participants,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua Rothstein wrote in an August filing. “The Defendant chose to be a part of the desecration of the Capitol rotunda. The Defendant stood in the center of the rotunda, where Ruther (sic) Bader Ginsburg, John Lewis, Ronald Reagan, Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Abraham Lincoln, among others, lied in state. What the Defendant chose to record and celebrate at that place, at that time, was antithetical to the events that most Americans associate with the Capitol rotunda.”

Indeed, his very presence in the Capitol rotunda that day was a desecration of hallowed ground.” (emphasis added)

Now, for credentialed D.C. insiders like Joshua Rothstein, that undoubtedly is true. After all, Reeder, unlike Joshua Rothstein, did not attend Columbia Law School. Reeder was a FedEx truck driver until the company fired him after his arrest and now he can’t find another job. As he said during his sentencing hearing last Friday, he is “radioactive”—so he cannot afford to throw himself a 40th birthday party like Joshua Rothstein just did. Rothstein’s party, held at a rented-out D.C. restaurant, was complete with truffles and monogrammed cookies and attended by former Homeland Security director Jeh Johnson and other Beltway bigwigs, Politico reported.

In fact, Robert Reeder, thanks to people like Josua Rothstein and his journo pals, doesn’t have many friends any more. Reeder’s teenage son, who shares his father’s name, doesn’t want to go to school; he’s bullied because of his father’s involvement on January 6, even though Reeder didn’t attack anyone or vandalize any property.

Reeder’s family and neighbors have abandoned him, too. As Reeder tearfully explained to a federal judge on Friday, even his church told him to stop coming because he was a distraction. “That’s tough because it was my support group,” Reeder told Judge Thomas Hogan, who ignored Reeder’s desperate plea for compassion and sentenced him to three months in prison for pleading guilty to one count of “parading” in the Capitol building—a place Hogan described as “sacrosanct.”

Rothstein, who wanted Reeder in jail for six months, told the court Reeder walked around like “he was a congressman” on January 6.

While it’s true Reeder did enter the Capitol building twice, he acted nothing like a United States congressman.

Reeder didn’t vote to add trillions to the national debt in the name of COVID relief, climate change, or infrastructure. He didn’t put his legislative imprimatur on COVID tyranny such as lockdowns, mask requirements, and vaccine mandates or cower to the teachers’ unions random demand of $640 billion to open schools this fall.

The official congressional record does not show Reeder as a co-sponsor of Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion boondoggle—a figure closer to $5 trillion according to some analyses—that will raise at least $2 trillion in new taxes and redistribute the windfall to Democrats’ pet projects including paid family leave, child tax credits, free college, expanded health care coverage, and “clean energy.”

Robert Reeder isn’t responsible for a wide open southern border that threatens our safety and our sovereignty. There’s no evidence he consented to deploy millions of U.S. troops and spend trillions of U.S. tax dollars on failed foreign wars that culminated with a humiliating exit from Afghanistan resuling in the murder of 13 American servicemembers while leaving behind $80 billion in weaponry and artillery.

He didn’t participate in two preposterous impeachment trials against Donald Trump, one of which was a ruse to cover-up the Biden family overseas racket before the 2020 primaries, or the vile character assasination of a Supreme Court justice nominee.

He didn’t marry his brother to commit immigration fraud, repeatedly lie to the American public about an “abundance of evidence” to prove Trump-Russia election collusion, scream “we’re gonna impeach the motherfucker” after being sworn-in to Congress, encourage people to publicly harass Trump officials, or bend a knee in the “sacred” Capitol building to honor George Floyd. There is no statement from Reeder condemning America as systemically racist and supporting a new federal holiday to collectively repent for George Floyd’s death.

Reeder never made empty promises to hold Big Tech, the FBI, and China accountable. Nor is he responsible for skyrocketing consumer prices, a stagnant national economy, a looming supply chain crisis, or the fact that public approval ratings for everyone from Joe Biden to congressional leaders of both parties are tanking.

Joshua Rothstein was wrong when he claimed that January 6 was the first time the Capitol had been invaded by “hostile participants.” With the exception of a handful of decent lawmakers, the “sacred” ground of the Capitol building is occupied by “hostile participants” every day—congressmen of both political parties, who hold American citizens such as Robert Reeder and the other 630-plus January 6 defendants in open contempt. Those representatives have done far more irreversible damage to the country than a few thousand Trump supporters could ever do—and, unlike January 6, their rampage is ongoing.

But the real heretics continue to rule while Robert Reeder, who told the court last week he “is a good man” despite how his government portrayed him, is off to jail. My guess, however, is that our country would be much better off if it were run by men like Reeder rather than the people in charge right now.

Saturday, September 25, 2021

Here’s What the 2020 Maricopa County Election Audit Actually Says.

 RIGGED:

 Maricopa County GOP audit confirms Biden 2020 victory in Arizona.

Related: 

Arizona Senate asks state attorney general for ‘formal’ investigation to bolster Maricopa election audit.

Plus: 

Ignore the MSM: Here’s What the 2020 Maricopa County Election Audit Actually Says.

While the media is claiming that the audit report confirms Biden’s victory, it does not. “There are sufficient discrepancies among the different systems that, in conjunction with some of our findings, suggest that the delta between the Presidential candidates is very close to the potential margin‐of‐error for the election,” the audit summary explains.

Here is a table showing the discrepancies and other issues found by the audit team and the number of ballots impacted. However, the audit team notes that no single finding would necessarily favor a single candidate. “In many cases there could be legitimate and legal votes within the Ballots Impact amount.”

Why do these matter? Because, according to the state-certified results, Joe Biden barely won the state by a 10,457-vote margin. The tiny margin of victory in the state-certified results means that these discrepancies are very troubling. There were 42,727 impacted ballots ranked as “high” or “critical” severity—that’s four times the certified margin of victory. If you include “medium” severity discrepancies, there were 53,214 impacted ballots—more than five times the certified margin of victory. Overall, there were 57,734 impacted ballots.

These findings don’t prove fraud, but certainly demonstrate the potential for fraud. And these impacted ballots have not been vetted.

So, has Joe Biden’s victory been proven? Not in the least. The truth is, we’ll never know the truth about how many ballots were impacted. Of course, the mainstream media knows this, which is why, deep down in CNN’s report about the audit, it laments that the draft report “shows that Cyber Ninjas and their subcontractors are still seeking ways to cast doubt on the election,” pointing to the thousands of ballots flagged.

The bottom line: The number of ballots impacted by discrepancies far exceeds Biden’s margin of victory in the state. Both sides of this debate will claim the report validates their position, but in truth, without proper vetting of the impacted ballots, we’ll never know if the election results were legitimate.

Which is damning enough.

T

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Voter Fraud Is a Supreme Court Problem

 

Voter Fraud Is a Supreme Court Problem

As a few American Greatness writers, and many of its readers, have pointed out: If our votes don’t count, nothing else matters. Election fraud should be the top subject in our minds every single day.

Last week, a brilliant piece by Ted McCartney suggested we march on Washington, D.C.—peacefully, but in huge numbers—with just a single demand: A constitutional amendment that requires all voting to take place in-person, on Election Day, with voter ID, on paper ballots, and that the ballots be counted that same evening on live-streamed television under the watchful eyes of as many in-person observers as want to be there.

This is an excellent idea. But now we have to think about the other half of this problem: If election laws aren’t enforced, they are essentially nonexistent. 

How many of us remember the way Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers in Michigan refused to certify the election results because the numbers didn’t add up—but then the cameras turned off for a few minutes, and, when they came back on, the Republicans announced they’d changed their minds and had decided to certify the results anyway? 

In Georgia, drop boxes that had been receiving dozens or a hundred votes a day suddenly, over Columbus Day weekend, received thousands—but there is no camera footage of these particular drop box locations, so we can’t see what happened. Georgia law requires that all drop boxes have cameras. Any location with no camera footage—and there are several—broke the law. But the Georgia pols figured: Who cares? Who’s going to hold us to account? The Supreme Court?

We all remember the Supreme Court’s disgraceful and disgusting behavior following the 2020 elections. Before the election was certified, the justices didn’t want to interfere with an ongoing process. After the election was certified, they refused to hear the election fraud cases because they said it was now a moot point—the election was a fait accompli. This reasoning could have been parodied from the episode of “Yes, Prime Minister, in which chief government bureaucrats explain the four stages of government intransigence:

1) We say nothing is going to happen

2) We say something might happen, but we should do nothing

3) We say maybe we should do something, but there’s nothing we can do

4) We say maybe we could have done something, but it’s too late now!

We live, or ought to be living, in a democratic republic in which the ultimate authority rests with the people. This should include ultimate authority over interpreting our own Constitution. Who, then, are the geniuses who decided that nine unelected bureaucrats get the ultimate say about whether any law we pass can actually be a law? Or whether any law actually gets enforced? The decision was made by those nine unelected bureaucrats themselves. The Constitution doesn’t grant the Supreme Court the power of judicial review—they just grabbed it. They stole it. And we said, “OK, sure. How much damage could it do?”

Of course, not everyone said that—until the Civil War, states continued to assert the right of nullification. They claimed that it was up to the states, and not up to judicial bureaucrats in Washington, to decide which laws were unconstitutional. And this was a much better system.

Each state should interpret the Constitution itself. A state might, for example, decide that Patriot Act-style legislation is unconstitutional, and refuse to allow the NSA to snoop on its citizens. Or a state might decide that “shall not be infringed” in the Second Amendment actually means “shall not be infringed.” Another state, of course, might love surveillance and believe that a shotgun with a short barrel needs to be registered with the government. But instead of that system being imposed on all 50 states through federal power, each state would handle these laws themselves, and Americans would move to states that interpret the Constitution in the way they think it ought to be interpreted. To each, his own.

Currently, we have 50 percent of this system in place—the bad 50 percent: States are violating laws on election integrity and other things (like immigration) with impunity. Because the current government in Washington likes those laws to be broken, it will do nothing to stop this freestyling. The Supreme Court will do nothing. It is time for the more robust states in the union to assert their prerogatives of freedom and to show the federal government the flipside of this coin.

What we need, in other words, is massive civil disobedience—organized not by individuals, but by freedom-loving states. 

The Biden Administration was not elected and is not legitimate. The government knows this—which is why they surround themselves with barbed wire and soldiers and send federal law enforcement to harass people. But this phony power is propped up by an institution that has always claimed to be impartial, an institution that managed to keep its black gowns all nice and starched and clean, even as its justices endorsed an election that broke the law simply because it came up with the result they preferred.

Don’t be fooled by the Supreme Court’s recent abortion decision into thinking they can be dependable in upholding the Constitution—they have simply positioned themselves in the public imagination as the indispensable, ultimate authority to whom we must all appeal. 

But any system that rests on the ultimate authority of the unelected is tyrannical. It is time for states to end this tyranny by reasserting their own rights—rights the Constitution endorses. Otherwise, our elections will continue to be meaningless. Because no matter how good the election laws are—and they won’t be very good to begin with—the federal government does not intend to enforce them.

Monday, August 23, 2021

15 Million Mail-in-Ballots Unaccounted for in 2020

 

Nearly 15 Million Mail-in-Ballots Unaccounted for in 2020 Election, Report Says

 
August 18, 2021 Updated: August 18, 2021
 

In the November 2020 general election, whose chaotic results have been vigorously disputed, almost 15 million mail-in ballots went unaccounted for, according to a good-government group that focuses on electoral integrity.

The research brief by the Indianapolis-based Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) notes that as the nation dealt last year with the CCP virus (which causes COVID-19), various U.S. states “hastily pushed traditionally in-person voters to mail ballots while, at the same time, trying to learn how to even administer such a scenario.”

PILF describes itself as “the nation’s only public interest law firm dedicated wholly to election integrity,” existing “to assist states and others to aid the cause of election integrity and fight against lawlessness in American elections.”

Former Justice Department civil rights attorney J. Christian Adams, now president of PILF, said the results don’t bode well for mail-in voting.

“These figures detail how the 2020 push to mail voting needs to be a one-year experiment,” Adams said in a statement.

Bills pending in Congress such as H.R. 1, the proposed “For The People Act,” “risk inflating these numbers even further, pushing our election system toward error, disenfranchisement, and ultimately widespread doubt about election outcomes,” Adams said.

“Some of the counties with the least experience in administering mail voting rejected the most ballots nationwide. If continued, 2020-style chaos will become the norm.”

PILF says it had warned that lost ballots would be an even bigger problem in 2020 compared to previous years. In total, elections in 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 saw more than 43.1 million unaccounted for mail-in ballots.

Federal data compilations show that during the 2020 election, there were 14.7 million ballots whose whereabouts were deemed “unknown” by election officials, according to the brief.

To gather the data, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission asked local officials how many ballots were not returned as voted, were undeliverable, or were otherwise “unable to be tracked.”

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) inspector general most recently reported that only 13 percent of mail ballots in the 2018 general election used the official tracking system, which means there is a wide variety of things that can happen to a ballot in the “unknown” column.

“A ballot can be put in the wrong mailbox and land in an unfriendly neighbor’s trash. It can be thrown out with your unpaid bills. It can be left outside for the wind to carry the last mile (like seen in Nevada in 2020). Election officials simply do not know what happened. Unknown ballots are the greatest blind spot in the American electoral system,” the brief states.

In the 2020 election, there were 14.7 million “unknown” ballots, along with 1.1 million undeliverable ballots, and 560,814 rejected ballots.

PILF put these figures in perspective by noting that President Joe Biden carried Arizona by 10,457 votes, yet Maricopa County, the state’s largest county, reportedly sent ballots to 110,092 outdated or wrong addresses. The post-voting audit process in Maricopa is still in progress.

The scenario roughly repeated itself in Nevada, a state where Biden prevailed by 33,596 votes, even though Clark County “bounced” 93,279 ballots.

“The lesson is clear: increased reliance on mass mail voting must correlate with aggressive voter registration list maintenance,” the brief concludes.

The report notes that many counties across the country had large numbers of “unknown” ballots.

In California, Los Angeles County had 1,491,459 such ballots, followed by Orange County (482,940), Riverside County (454,911), San Diego County (317,614), San Bernardino County (274,937), Santa Clara County (251,840), and Sacramento County (241,367).

Clark County, Nevada, had 724,708 such ballots. Essex County, New Jersey, had 248,290 unknown ballots, and Maricopa County had 229,123 ballots in the unknown category.

Matthew Vadum 
Matthew Vadum
CONTRIBUTOR
Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist and a recognized expert in left-wing activism.

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Two-thirds want BLM riots probed, more than Jan. 6

 What America Wants - Probe BLM Not Jan 6th


Two-thirds want BLM riots probed, more than Jan. 6

66% of Likely U.S. Voters think Congress should investigate last year’s violent protests, in which more than 2,000 police officers suffered injuries in the line of duty. Democrats have been pushing for a partisan, witch-hunt-type investigation into the crowd of Trump supporters who were trespassing on federal property on January 6.