Showing posts with label Clinton Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton Foundation. Show all posts

Saturday, December 23, 2017

Was The Steele Dossier The FBI’s “Insurance Policy?”

ANDREW MCCARTHY:

Was The Steele Dossier The FBI’s “Insurance Policy?”

 “There were layers of insulation between the Clinton campaign and Steele — the campaign and the Democratic party retained a law firm, which contracted with Fusion GPS, which in turn hired the former spy. At some point, though, perhaps early on, the FBI and DOJ learned that the dossier was actually a partisan opposition-research product. By then, they were dug in. No one, after all, would be any the wiser: Hillary would coast to victory, so Democrats would continue running the government; FISA materials are highly classified, so they’d be kept under wraps. Just as it had been with the Obama-era’s Fast and Furious and IRS scandals, any malfeasance would remain hidden. The best laid schemes . . . gang aft agley.”
P

Friday, October 28, 2016

Clinton donor got State Department invite — and Bill got $17M.

PAY-TO-PLAY:

Clinton donor got State Department invite — and Bill got $17M.
The head of a for-profit university that donated up to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation was rewarded with an invite to a high-profile State Department dinner at the request of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Doug Becker, CEO of Laureate International University, got his senior VP, Joseph Duffey, into the meeting of world-class academics at the August 2009 dinner because Becker was someone “who Bill likes a lot” and his school was “the fastest growing college network in the world,” Clinton wrote in an e-mail to her chief of staff revealed on WikiLeaks.
“It’s a for-profit model that should be represented.”
Roughly nine months later, the university signed Bubba to a sweet deal as an “honorary chancellor,” paying him $17.6 million over five years until the contract ended in 2015 as his wife launched her presidential run.
Analysts said Duffey’s presence at the dinner likely opened doors to the school that otherwise might have remained closed.
You don’t say.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

‘Bill Clinton Inc.- Intersection of charity and personal income

Inside ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’: Hacked memo reveals intersection of charity and personal income

16 / 25


When top Bill Clinton aide Douglas Band wrote the memo, he was a central player at the Clinton
In doing so, Band also detailed a circle of enrichment in which he raised money for the Clinton Foundation from top-tier corporations such as Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola that were clients of his firm, Teneo, while pressing many of those same donors to provide personal income to the former president.
The system has drawn scrutiny from Republicans, who say it allowed corporations and other wealthy supporters to pay for entree to a popular former president and a onetime secretary of state who is now the Democratic presidential nominee.
Band wrote the memo in 2011 to foundation lawyers conducting a review of the organization amid a brewing feud with the Clintons’ daughter, Chelsea Clinton, who was taking a stronger role in leading the foundation and had expressed concerns about Teneo’s operations.
The memo, made public Wednesday by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, lays out the aggressive strategy behind lining up the consulting contracts and paid speaking engagements for Bill Clinton that added tens of millions of dollars to the family’s fortune, including during the years that Hillary Clinton led the State Department. It describes how Band helped run what he called “Bill Clinton Inc.,” obtaining “in-kind services for the President and his family — for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like.”
Band and his Teneo co-founder, former Hillary Clinton fundraiser Declan Kelly, declined to comment. But Teneo issued a statement saying that “as the memo demonstrates, Teneo worked to encourage clients, where appropriate, to support the Clinton Foundation because of the good work that it does around the world. It also clearly shows that Teneo never received any financial benefit or benefit of any kind from doing so.”
Spokesmen for Bill Clinton and Chelsea Clinton and the foundation declined to comment.
Hillary Clinton campaign spokesman Glen Caplin declined to comment on the memo, calling the material “hacked by the Russian government and weaponized by WikiLeaks.” Caplin declined to authenticate the memo, but he also did not dispute it.
Band, who grew close to Bill Clinton two decades ago as his personal aide in the White House and became the architect of his post-presidential activities, argued in the memo that he and his firm had benefited the former president and his foundation.
“We have dedicated ourselves to helping the President secure and engage in for-profit activities,” Band wrote. He also said he had “sought to leverage my activities, including my partner role at Teneo, to support and to raise funds for the foundation.”
Band’s memo provided data showing how much money each of Teneo’s 20 clients at the time had given to the Clinton Foundation, how much they had paid Bill Clinton and, in some cases, how he or Kelly had personally forged the relationships that resulted in the payments.
Band wrote that Teneo partners had raised in excess of $8 million for the foundation and $3 million in paid speaking fees for Bill Clinton. He said he had secured contracts for the former president that would pay out $66 million over the subsequent nine years if the deals remained in place.
For instance, Band wrote that Kelly arranged for the former president to meet the chief executive of Coca-Cola in January 2009 at the Clintons’ home in Washington. In all, according to Band’s memo, Coke had contributed $4.33 million to the foundation between 2004 and 2010.
A Coca-Cola spokesman said the company had supported the Clinton Foundation because it believed “in the great work that can be done when businesses, civil society and governments come together to solve problems.” He said Teneo had been hired to provide “business and communications” consulting.
Band also described how Kelly helped expand a fruitful relationship with UBS Global Wealth Management, introducing Bill Clinton to a top executive at a 2009 charity dinner. In the ensuing years, UBS upped its giving to the foundation, signed on as a Teneo client and agreed to pay Bill Clinton for speeches, Band wrote.
Records show UBS paid Clinton about $2 million in speaking fees between 2011 and 2015 for a series of appearances, generally alongside former president George W. Bush. The company also paid Hillary Clinton $225,000 for a 2013 speech.
UBS declined to comment.
Another achievement cited by Band: Laureate International Universities, a chain of for-profit international colleges, which donated to the foundation and agreed to pay Bill Clinton $3.5 million a year to serve as honorary chancellor.
Clinton has credited Band with conceiving of the Clinton Global Initiative, the glitzy annual meeting where corporate, government and nonprofit leaders gathered annually to talk about the world’s problems. Started in 2005, CGI became the best-known arm of the Clinton Foundation, which also operated education, environmental and health programs around the world. The final CGI meeting took place last month.
By 2011, the longtime Clinton aide was ready to strike out on his own.
That’s when Band and Kelly joined forces to form Teneo. At first, the firm remained closely linked to the Clinton network.
Band described in the memo how he combined his work for CGI and Teneo. He wrote that he had used a hotel room upstairs from the 2011 CGI gathering to meet with Teneo clients. He also acknowledged giving free CGI memberships to “target Teneo clients” being cultivated as potential foundation donors. Memberships generally cost $20,000 a year.
Teneo, meanwhile, named Bill Clinton its “honorary chairman.” Clinton had been initially tapped for a three-year arrangement in which he would provide advice to Teneo “regarding geopolitical, economic and social trends,” according to a separate June 2011 memo that Band wrote to the State Department seeking ethics approval for the former president’s employment.
Bill Clinton was initially paid $2 million by Teneo, according to “Man of the World,” a book written with the former president’s participation by author Joe Conason.
But Chelsea Clinton grew concerned when news leaked in late 2011 that MF Global, the hedge fund owned by former New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, had been paying the Clinton-tied firm $125,000 a month just before MF Global went bankrupt.
According to emails released by WikiLeaks, Chelsea Clinton complained in December 2011 to longtime Clinton aide John Podesta, who at the time was serving as an adviser to the Clinton Foundation, that she had been informed that a member of her father’s office staff who answered to Band had been making calls to British lawmakers “on behalf of President Clinton” for Teneo clients, particularly for the chief executive of Dow Chemical.
Chelsea Clinton wrote that the calls were occurring without her father’s knowledge and that the reactions she was hearing to them would “horrify” Bill Clinton. In another email, she wrote she feared Teneo was “hustling business at CGI.”
Chelsea Clinton’s concerns helped spark efforts at the foundation to adopt new policies governing outside consulting agreements designed to erect a more solid wall between Bill Clinton’s private and charitable activities. Emails show that Cheryl Mills, who at the time was serving as Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department, was deeply involved in the foundation’s proceedings.
Bill Clinton also separated from Teneo, returning to the company all but $100,000 of the money he had been paid, tax returns show.
Emails show how the dispute between Chelsea Clinton and her father’s longtime aide led to personal hostility.
“I don’t deserve this from her and deserve a tad more respect or at least a direct dialogue for me to explain these things,” Band wrote to Podesta at the time. “She is acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she’s doing because she, as she has said, hasn’t found her way and has a lack of focus in her life.”
Band complained that no similar scrutiny was being applied to Bill Clinton himself. Band noted that he had previously signed a conflict of interest document for CGI.
“Oddly, WJC does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc.,” he wrote.
The Band memo disclosed by WikiLeaks on Wednesday made no direct reference to Hillary Clinton.
But Band outlined that Kelly, his Teneo co-founder, had served simultaneously between 2009 and 2011 as an unpaid economic envoy to Northern Ireland appointed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and as head of a separate consulting company whose clients included Coke, UBS and Dow. Band wrote that the arrangement was consistent with Kelly’s State Department ethics agreement.
Kelly’s multiple roles came together during one State Department event in 2010, when then-Secretary Clinton recognized Dow, among other companies, for creating jobs in Northern Ireland and thanked Kelly for his work on the issue.
Dow became one of Teneo’s first major clients. According to Band’s memo, Dow chief executive Andrew Liveris had been introduced to Bill Clinton over a round of golf with Kelly in August 2009.
The company then increased its Clinton Foundation support, contributing $705,000 in 2010 and 2011. A Dow spokeswoman said that the company’s participation in the foundation dated to 2007 and that the charity was “aligned to core business and citizenship strategies that have positively leveraged the resources and capabilities of our company.”
Dow paid Teneo $2.8 million in 2011, payments that then jumped to $19.4 million in 2012, according to internal Dow documents made public as part of a whistleblower complaint. The company later said in public filings that the increase reflected a cost-saving decision to consolidate several consulting contracts with one firm.
But the spike raised red flags for an internal company fraud investigator, who expressed alarm that it may be linked to Bill Clinton’s work with a charity founded by Liveris — a charge the company denied.
“It appears Dow is paying Teneo for connections with Clinton,” the investigator wrote.
Anu Narayanswamy and Alice Crites contributed to this report.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Clinton Scandal : A Case Study

Clinton Scandal: A Case Study In How Bill And Hillary Cashed In Through Their Foundation

Clintons: Former President Bill Clinton took home nearly $18 million over five years as the face man of a for-profit university that wanted to use Hillary Clinton's State Department, the Washington Post reports. Funny, seems we've heard this one before.
In an editorial back on June 14, we asked the question: "Why Isn't The Press Covering Clinton For-Profit University Scheme?" In it, we detailed what was then known about Clinton's "job" as honorary chancellor for Laureate International Universities, a for-profit business that leveraged students' ability to get federally backed loans to attend Laureate's "universities."
Recall that, at the time of our piece, the media were full of outraged articles about the defunct, for-profit "Trump University" and what a blatant fraud it appeared to be. Trump was derided as a huckster, solely in it for the money.
But the extraordinarily lucrative ties of Bill and Hillary Clinton to Laureate, also a for-profit university that has been challenged by former students as a diploma factory living off federal loans? Crickets.
To its credit, the Post has looked further into the scheme. Turns out, in August 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explicitly asked those making up the guest list of an official State Department dinner to include Doug Becker of Laureate. Why? Laureate was "the fastest growing college network in the world" and Becker was someone that "Bill likes a lot," Hillary wrote.
Nothing criminal or suspicious there. Except that nine months later, former President Clinton signed a big-money deal to be a "consultant" and "honorary chancellor" for Laureate. His take over the five years: $17.6 million. He stepped down from his honorary post in April 2015, just as Hillary was beginning her candidacy.
No, these two events are not coincidental. As Sam Pitroda, an expert on higher education who also attended the 2009 dinner told the Post, such an invitation "gets you very high-level contacts, and it gets you to the right people." In short, it was potentially extraordinarily lucrative for Laureate.
Far from following her pledge to keep an "arms length" between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department, it sure looks like Hillary used her official office to solicit money for her hubby Bill — and, of course, by extension, herself. It looks, smells and feels like felony malfeasance. Yet the media let this fester for months with nary a peep. Curious.
Oh, and by the way, did we say that Laureate was backed by billionaire self-described socialist George Soros? It is. And it's not a tiny enterprise, with $4.3 billion in revenue in 2015, 800,000 students worldwide with some 70 schools in 30 countries, including its flagship school, U.S.-based Walden University, which is accredited.
In our June piece on the scandal, we noted that Clinton worked as a "glorified pitchman" for the university. We quoted George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who wrote that "many have alleged (Walden) is a scam designed to bilk students of tens of thousands of dollars for degrees."
We can't exactly call it irony that Hillary Clinton this year has vowed to "crack down on predatory schools" that "load students up with debt for programs that don't lead to good-paying jobs," leaving students and taxpayers "holding the bag."
No, that's chutzpah. Especially when, as NBC News reports, Walden had one of the highest debt loads of any school in the U.S., according to a 2015 study.
This is just one part of the dirty business of the Clinton Foundation. Just ask Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel, whom the Sunday Times of London once called "one of the finest analysts of financial statements on the planet." After more than a year of study of the Clinton Foundation, Ortel this week published a stunning conclusion: "To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that has neither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 to date ... it is a case study in international charity fraud, of mammoth proportions."
Add this to the continually growing list of money-related scandals that plague the Clinton family, their foundation and their connection to the U.S. government. Bill Clinton was able to parlay his time in office into hundreds of millions of dollars of personal wealth through the auspices of the family-run Clinton Foundation.
In 2009, he got another trip through the revolving doors when Hillary became the nation's top diplomat, and Bill and his "charitable" foundation again cashed in.
One has to wonder what novel way Bill and Hillary will again find to enrich themselves if, and when, she wins the U.S. presidency.
RELATED:

Monday, August 29, 2016

MAJOR CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR DENIED ENTRY INTO U.S. DUE TO TERROR TIES (Of Course)

MAJOR CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR DENIED ENTRY INTO U.S. DUE TO TERROR TIES

The name Gilbert Chagoury will be familiar to many readers. He’s a friend of Bill Clinton and a major donor to the Clinton Foundation. According to Judicial Watch, which cites Clinton Foundation documents, Chagoury has appeared near the top of the Foundation’s donor list as a $1 million to $5 million contributor.
Chagoury’s name came up recently in a newly released 2009 email from Clinton Foundation official Doug Band to Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, who were then top aides to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Band told Mills and Abeden to put to put Chagoury in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon. Band explained that Chagoury is a “key guy [in Lebanon] and to us.”
At $1-5 million, you bet he’s a key guy to the Clintons.
In our post about this email, we noted that Chagoury was convicted in 2000 in Switzerland for laundering money from Nigeria. He is thus another in a long line of crooks with whom the Clintons have closely associated themselves, dating back to their Arkansas days.
But Chagoury isn’t just a crook. The Los Angeles Times reports that Chagoury was denied entry into the U.S. last year because of his ties to a Lebanese organization that has allegedly given money to the terrorist group Hezbollah. (Hat Tip: Chuck Ross at the Daily Caller.)
According to the LA Times, the State Department denied Chagoury’s visitor’s visa after he applied for one at the U.S. embassy in Paris last summer. The State Department made its determination based on a 2013 FBI intelligence report which cited sources saying that Chagoury gave money to Michel Aoun, a Lebanese politician who was suspected of “facilitating fundraising for Hezbollah.”
Aoun is the founder of the Free Patriotic Movement, an Iranian backed Shiite group that the U.S. has designated a terrorist organization because of its role in the 1983 attacks on the U.S. embassy and U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.
So the Clinton Foundation interceded with the Clinton State Department to help not just a donor but a donor who the State Department, now that Hillary Clinton doesn’t run it anymore, doesn’t think should be admitted to the U.S. because of his ties to terrorists.
But it may be worse than that. It may be that the Clinton Foundation interceded with the Clinton State Department in furtherance of the donor’s efforts to help his friend Aoun, the head of a terrorist organization.
Ross cites a CNN report that the Clinton campaign said on background that Chagoury sought contact with a U.S. official in charge of Lebanese affairs in order to discuss issues related to elections that would be held months later.
Aoun was up for re-election that year, says Ross. So when Band told Mills and Abedin to put Chagoury in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon, it might have been for the purpose of helping Chagoury’s friend Aoun in an election. (From all that appears, Chagoury and Aoun are no longer friends or allies; I haven’t been able to determine what their relationship was in 2009 when Band pushed Mills and Abedin for the meeting.)
It’s not clear whether Chagoury got a meeting with the U.S. “substance person on Lebanon.” It is clear that Chagoury had access, via the Clinton Foundation and by virtue of his donations to that outfit, to Hillary Clinton’s top aides at the very least, and that Abedin followed up on Band’s request on behalf of Chagoury.
Last year, by the way, wasn’t the first time Chagoury had trouble entering the U.S. In 2010, according to Ross, his private jet was grounded at an airport in New Jersey. The Department of Homeland Security eventually apologized for the incident.
It would be interesting to know whether then-Secretary of State Clinton or her staff had anything to do with securing the apology. In any case, with Clinton long gone, it appears there was no apology for the State Department’s refusal to allow Chagoury to enter the U.S. last year.
Unfortunately, it’s likely that Hillary soon will be back, and not just at State. With her will come her husband and a seemingly endless parade of crooks and sharp operators who are ready and well-positioned to have their needs and interests attended to by the new administration without regard to the nation’s interest or, indeed, its security.

MAJOR CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR DENIED ENTRY INTO U.S. DUE TO TERROR TIES

MAJOR CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR DENIED ENTRY INTO U.S. DUE TO TERROR TIES

The name Gilbert Chagoury will be familiar to many readers. He’s a friend of Bill Clinton and a major donor to the Clinton Foundation. According to Judicial Watch, which cites Clinton Foundation documents, Chagoury has appeared near the top of the Foundation’s donor list as a $1 million to $5 million contributor.
Chagoury’s name came up recently in a newly released 2009 email from Clinton Foundation official Doug Band to Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, who were then top aides to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Band told Mills and Abeden to put to put Chagoury in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon. Band explained that Chagoury is a “key guy [in Lebanon] and to us.”
At $1-5 million, you bet he’s a key guy to the Clintons.
In our post about this email, we noted that Chagoury was convicted in 2000 in Switzerland for laundering money from Nigeria. He is thus another in a long line of crooks with whom the Clintons have closely associated themselves, dating back to their Arkansas days.
But Chagoury isn’t just a crook. The Los Angeles Times reports that Chagoury was denied entry into the U.S. last year because of his ties to a Lebanese organization that has allegedly given money to the terrorist group Hezbollah. (Hat Tip: Chuck Ross at the Daily Caller.)
According to the LA Times, the State Department denied Chagoury’s visitor’s visa after he applied for one at the U.S. embassy in Paris last summer. The State Department made its determination based on a 2013 FBI intelligence report which cited sources saying that Chagoury gave money to Michel Aoun, a Lebanese politician who was suspected of “facilitating fundraising for Hezbollah.”
Aoun is the founder of the Free Patriotic Movement, an Iranian backed Shiite group that the U.S. has designated a terrorist organization because of its role in the 1983 attacks on the U.S. embassy and U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.
So the Clinton Foundation interceded with the Clinton State Department to help not just a donor but a donor who the State Department, now that Hillary Clinton doesn’t run it anymore, doesn’t think should be admitted to the U.S. because of his ties to terrorists.
But it may be worse than that. It may be that the Clinton Foundation interceded with the Clinton State Department in furtherance of the donor’s efforts to help his friend Aoun, the head of a terrorist organization.
Ross cites a CNN report that the Clinton campaign said on background that Chagoury sought contact with a U.S. official in charge of Lebanese affairs in order to discuss issues related to elections that would be held months later.
Aoun was up for re-election that year, says Ross. So when Band told Mills and Abedin to put Chagoury in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon, it might have been for the purpose of helping Chagoury’s friend Aoun in an election. (From all that appears, Chagoury and Aoun are no longer friends or allies; I haven’t been able to determine what their relationship was in 2009 when Band pushed Mills and Abedin for the meeting.)
It’s not clear whether Chagoury got a meeting with the U.S. “substance person on Lebanon.” It is clear that Chagoury had access, via the Clinton Foundation and by virtue of his donations to that outfit, to Hillary Clinton’s top aides at the very least, and that Abedin followed up on Band’s request on behalf of Chagoury.
Last year, by the way, wasn’t the first time Chagoury had trouble entering the U.S. In 2010, according to Ross, his private jet was grounded at an airport in New Jersey. The Department of Homeland Security eventually apologized for the incident.
It would be interesting to know whether then-Secretary of State Clinton or her staff had anything to do with securing the apology. In any case, with Clinton long gone, it appears there was no apology for the State Department’s refusal to allow Chagoury to enter the U.S. last year.
Unfortunately, it’s likely that Hillary soon will be back, and not just at State. With her will come her husband and a seemingly endless parade of crooks and sharp operators who are ready and well-positioned to have their needs and interests attended to by the new administration without regard to the nation’s interest or, indeed, its security.